著者
小田 佳子 近藤 良享
出版者
日本体育・スポーツ哲学会
雑誌
体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.34, no.2, pp.125-140, 2012 (Released:2013-07-31)
参考文献数
64
被引用文献数
1 2

In this study we would like to focus on Korean KUMDO which has represented a significant rise in the international KENDO world since 1990.The purpose of this study is to indicate the direction of the international expansion of Japanese KENDO through the following two points of view, while clarifying the conflict and the course between Japanese KENDO and Korean KUMDO. One point is an approach toward cultural universalism, which means that Japanese KENDO should be transmitted to the world and root in other countries as itself, and the other is an approach to cultural relativism, which means that not only Japanese KENDO but also other KENDO from other countries should be admitted with mutual approval of cultural properties. This discussion consists of the following3 parts:1. Conflict between Korean KUMDO and Japanese KENDO2. Trend in the international KENDO world3. Challenges for the international expansion of Japanese KENDOOn the basis of the course and the conflict between Korean KUMDO and Japanese KENDO, KENDO takes the position of cultural universalism, on the other hand KUMDO has the position of cultural relativism and it tries to find a way to internationalize KUMDO for their competition.For the international expansion of KENDO, it is inevitable to construct the Modern KENDO by reconstructing Japanese KENDO with reviewing the tradition of KENDO thoughts and its principle, objectify and verbalization of KENDO skills and referees, while taking consideration of the different cultures, not just a KENDO spread abroad by ambiguous domestic recognition.
著者
近藤 良享
出版者
日本スポーツとジェンダー学会
雑誌
スポーツとジェンダー研究 (ISSN:13482157)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.14, pp.121-133, 2016 (Released:2017-04-25)
参考文献数
17

The topic of equality and fairness in sports rules can be debated from a variety of perspectives. Accordingly, this research seeks to analyze the various theories regarding separate events for men and women discussed by sports philosophers and sports ethicists and proposes the use of a handicapping method. Based on the analysis of theories, it can be concluded that separate events for men and women is currently accepted by sports philosophers and sports ethicists. If a system that could provide both equality of opportunity and equality of results in sports were created, competitors who put in the greatest effort or who were lucky would likely win. The method of achieving this is handicapping or sports standardization. Paul Weiss, a sports philosopher, explains the effects as follows: “Handicaps are imposed so that even if weight, sex, or experience are different, a better competitor can compete equally against a weaker competitor. This imposes a restriction on the better competitor so that he/she is at the same level as others while allowing better conditions or a higher score for the weaker competitor, providing an opportunity to beat a superior athlete on equal terms.” Weiss indicates that the intention of sports standardization is not to encourage participation in sports by more people by making it possible for anyone to win, but rather to provide opportunities for each individual to learn what they can achieve by overcoming limitations such as weight, sex, and experience. Handicapped sports recognize differences in birth, sex, background, competitive ability, values, and so on without eliminating the reasons for the individual differences and create a place for competition. When individuals recognize one another, society as a whole become stronger. The elimination of gender from sports that use handicaps has particular significance in disseminating the strengthening of society itself from the world of sports.
著者
田原 淳子 真田 久 嵯峨 寿 近藤 良享 建石 真公子 舛本 直文 師岡 文男 來田 享子
出版者
国士舘大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2006

オリンピック競技大会を招致する上で、国際オリンピック委員会(IOC)から求められる諸条件と評価される点について最近の動向を明らかにした。さらに、日本における過去のオリンピックの招致活動をその後の状況を含めて検証し、問題点と評価される点を明らかにした。将来のオリンピック競技大会を招致、開催するにあたり、重視すべき観点は、環境・人権・教育の3 点に集約された。
著者
近藤 良享
出版者
中京大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2015-04-01

本研究ではRTP選手ではなくドーピング検査対象になっていない学生/選手(非RTPA)を対象にドーピング問題を検討した。結果として、検査方法などに抜け道があればドーピングに手を染める選手の現状は防止教育の難しさを物語っていた。問題解決に厳罰主義か、緩和主義かがある中、日本の「世間」という個人と社会の媒介を利用した、教育的スポーツを連帯責任システムによって堅持する方法論は検討に値する。伝統や美徳を大切にする共同体主義的傾向が強い日本社会では、教育的スポーツをベースにして、正しいスポーツ教育、スポーツのインティグリティ教育、ドーピング防止教育を推進することが必要と考えられる。
著者
竹村 瑞穂 近藤 良享
出版者
Japanese Society of Sport Education
雑誌
スポーツ教育学研究 (ISSN:09118845)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, no.1, pp.13-23, 2008-11-30 (Released:2010-08-10)
参考文献数
27

The purpose of this paper is to examine prior arguments about the necessity of prohibiting doping. Up until now, arguments about this issue have unfolded in many ways. This time, prior arguments were examined and an attempt was made to clarify the construction of this issue and the remaining problems. Papers analyzed were limited to those written from an ethical standpoint without the presumption that doping is wrong.In the course of examining prior arguments based on prohibiting of doping, four main standpoints can be listed as follows.1. A position that seeks reconsideration of the propriety of prohibiting doping from the viewpoint of “paternalism” or “free will”.2. A position that seeks reconsideration about the necessity of prohibiting doping from the viewpoint of the concept of “fair” or “justice”.3. A position that considers the necessity of prohibiting doping from the viewpoint of natural demand from parts of the human body.4. A position that encourages reconsideration of prohibiting doping from a modern viewpoint of the body in connection.In conclusion, these standpoints can be classified into two categories. One is the problem of “the essence of sports” and the other is “the bio-ethical problem” such as that of the right of body possession or free will. These two issues along with the new arrival of genetic enhancement or gene doping, are ones of significant concern remaining to be answered in the realm of sports and ethics.
著者
近藤 良享
出版者
Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
雑誌
体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.19, no.1, pp.53-65, 1997 (Released:2010-04-30)
参考文献数
57
被引用文献数
2 2

The purpose of this paper is to reconsider ethically the Gender Verification Regulation, then to propose an ethically rational means. The points of reconsideration are (1) the irrationality of sex differentiation in competitive sports, (2) the possibility of defamation of character and an invasion of privacy, (3) necessity for informed consent, and (4) the athletes' right to equal respect and concern.Proposals here are as follows:1) The host international sport organizations require every single athlete who will entry to participate in women's event, to hand in her national medical certification issued by each national sport organization.2) Some winning athletes or athletes by random sampling in women's event take only the first test of sex chromosome, which can exclude an impersonator or a transsexual athlete, in order to give proof of the acuracy of their national certification issued.3) A close examination should not be executed just because sex chromosome abnormality can not select by oneself, even though a few suspect athletes were identified,
著者
森田 啓 片岡 暁夫 近藤 良享
出版者
Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
雑誌
体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.2, pp.25-43, 1998 (Released:2010-04-30)
参考文献数
48

The purpose of this study is to show that the sport world should choose the common good based on the dispute between liberalist and communitarian.Though the word liberalism is ambiguous, we define liberalism as the thought based on unencumbered selves (M. J. Sandel), which includes utilitarianism, deontological liberalism, or revisionist's liberalism. Needless to say, liberalism depends on civic virtues.Liberal democracy in this century destroys the civic virtues, so that liberalism reaches the extreme relativism which denies the past and present values and goodness and affirms the unlimited selfishness, especially economic one.In favor of communitarians' criticism, we agree with Sandel's contention of situated selves rather than ‘unencumbered selves’ and propose that we should make an effort to recover the common good in our society.Turning to the sport world, we have gradually swept away its original ethics such as sportsmanship, fair play and the mind of social relationship in England in 19th century. And now the sport world also accepts the tendency of the unlimited self-interest, especially economic one.The ethics of ordinary world has nothing to do with that of the sport world, but the latter bases on the former. In conclusion, we must note that the sport world should maintain the traditional common good because the ordinary world also needs to reinstate us in the common good.
著者
近藤 良享
出版者
日本体育・スポーツ哲学会
雑誌
体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.1, pp.15-30, 1998
被引用文献数
1

The purpose of this study is to clarify the issue of an individual's sovereignty over his own body and person in the field of professional boxing.<br>This study is based on the debate between the well-known principles of individual sovereignty as presented by John Stuart Mill and the paternalistic regulations issued by the Japanese Boxing Commission (JBC).<br>The results here are as follows:<br>1. In a free society which emphasizes individual autonomy, a professional boxer such as J. Tatsuyoshi has sovereignty over his own body, the reason being that strong paternalism cannot be justified in the case of adult athletes.<br>2. In order to promote sound professional boxing, JBC should provide safe athletic settings and examine the medical condition of all boxers by means of medical examinations and empirical studies.<br>3. A balance of sovereignty and paternalism in sports should be achieved in an open system for all athletes. Moreover, unfair regulations should be replaced with fair ones.
著者
近藤 良享 野津 有司 真田 久 河野 一郎
出版者
筑波大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2002

この研究は、国内外のスポーツ界における薬物等ドーピングを防止するために,教育プログラムや啓蒙を行うための基礎的資料を得ることを目的とした。本研究では,まずアンチ・ドーピング対する実態を把握するために,世界アンチ・ドーピング機構(WADA)と日本アンチ・ドーピング機構(JADA)との共同プロジェクトと絡めて、ドーピングに対する意識調査項目(60項目)を作成し、日本の体育系大学のトップレベルの選手、288名に対する予備調査を実施した。この調査結果をふまえ、JOC五輪強化指定選手およびJADA加盟団体選手に対する意識調査(調査項目を10項目に精選)を2,800名に行った。さらに,JADA加盟団体所属選手らと同じドーピングに対する意識調査を体育・スポーツ系のT大学の学生(744名)に実施した。その結果,T大学生とJADA調査との比較検討から,今後の日本におけるアンチ・ドーピング教育の多くの課題が引き出された。具体的には、アンチ・ドーピング意識が,JADA調査の選手らよりもかなり低く,アンチ・ドーピング意識が不完全であること、また,ドーピングに関する知識・情報が,大学生も日本代表選手らへの提供も全く不十分な状況が示された。アンチ・ドーピングの教育・啓蒙のための教材づくりや支援システムを構築する必要性が浮き彫りにされた。世界アンチ・ドーピング規程へのWADAとIFsの締結期限が2004年8月のアテネ開会式前日であり、これより国際レベルでのアンチ・ドーピング活動が開始された。さらにユネスコ国際条約として,2006年2月の政府関係機関の締結が終われば、アンチ・ドーピング運動が国際スポーツ団体・国家レベルで一体となって展開されることになり、ハード面のドーピング撲滅への足がかりが整うが、未だに不十分な健全なアンチ・ドーピング観の形成を行うためのソフト開発が求められる。