文献一覧: 関西学院大学 (出版者)

The content of this article is as follows : 1. Introduction 2. Japanese Culture and Japanese Nationality (1) Interrelation between Japanese Culture and Nationality Argument (2) Japanese Language 3. Analysis of the Japanese Nationality Argument (1) Anti-jury Argument based upon Japanese Nationality (2) Classic and Revised Japanese Characteristics Argument (3) Japanese Legal Consciousness and Nationality Argument 4. Mixed Court System and Nationality (1) Structure of Mixed Court System (2) Pro-Mixed Court Argument in Japan (3) Examination of Japanese Nationality in the Procedure of Mixed Court Trial 5. Conclusion 1. This paper examines three basic aspects on the civil participation into the judiciary in Japan : first, to analyze the Japanese nationality discourse in the context of the so-called "Japanese Culture, " second, to explore both the function and the reality of the mixed court system and, finally, to scrutinize whether or not the Japanese culture obstructs the normal function of the mixed court system in Japan. 2. Although Japan once had a criminal jury system before World War II (1928-1943), since then Japan has had no civil participation system in trials (with the minor exception of using lay assessors in the civil mediation stage.) In the modern world, it might be atypical enough to see a country that employs professional judges, solely recruited from among young legal trainees and trained as career judges, who exclusively preside over trials without any involvement of lay citizens. In the construction era immediately after World War II, there was a proposal to introduce the jury system into Japan by the SCAP (Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers). Japanese high officials declined to accept the idea, explaining that the Japanese were too immature, the jury system was incompatible with Japanese character, and the Japanese' respect and deference to the higher authority. 3. The exploitation of Japanese uniqueness, such as Japanese culture, nationality, weather, national ritual in order to reject introduction of foreign goods was well exemplified by the Japanese high officials who confronted foreign pressure about the restricted trade policy. Their cliche is since Japan has its own tradition and culture, the foreign goods are not suitable to Japan and will bring adverse effects to the nation. They often utilized the claim of Japanese uniqueness claim to contest international pressure to open the Japanese market, for products like oranges and rice (they said that Japanese liked more oranges with soft skin and sticky rice.) 4. Apart from the high official's claiming the Japanese uniqueness, the Japanese nationality argument is often cited as a reason to resist implementing a new legal system in Japan. Above all legal scholars and lawyers use the Japanese nationality argument against the introduction of jury systems in Japan. Because the Japanese are inclined to rely upon the authority, resist expressing shy to express their own opinion, and shy away from arguments, have no concern with others, the jury system where a group of lay citizens find facts and concludes with a final verdict would bring a disastrous result, and thus they believe in the trials presided by professional judges. The basic tenet of this way of thinking is that without the best and brightest people's (high officials' or professionals') control, the Japanese will lose their way and cannot manage things by themselves. This contention has two presumptions : Japanese people are incapable of with handling fact-finding because of their national characteristics and, secondly, those who manage judiciaries (mainly professional judges) are exempted from those kind of general characteristics. Are these presumptions appropriate? 5. Basically from where did the stereotypical generalization of the Japanese character come? Some "anthropologists" and "sociologists" seriously have examined the source of the Japanese uniqueness. Some explained with a geological reason

2017-11-09 03:00:07
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110000213876

1 0 0 0 OA 危機的調査環境下における新たな社会調査手法の開発

著者: 大谷信介後藤範明木下栄二小松洋永野武
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 基盤研究(A)
巻号頁・発行日: 2005

研究成果の概要:住民基本台帳などの公的名簿の使用制限によって困難となっているサンプリングの現状を打開するため、「住宅地図」を用いたサンプリング手法の開発と問題点を考察した。高松市調査によって、一戸建てを対象とした社会調査では「住宅地図」サンプリングは使用可能性が高いことが証明された。西宮市調査では、アパート・マンションを対象とした調査を実際に実施し、どのような問題点が存在しどのような工夫が必要となるかを検証した。

2017-10-27 11:54:25
1 + 0 Twitter

https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17203035/

1 0 0 0 OA <論説>土地収用法における指名委員制について : 特に単独指名委員制の全面的活用について

著者: 足立忠夫
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 法と政治 (ISSN:02880709)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.41, no.1, pp.1-47, 1990-03-20

This paper discusses the legality and constitutionality of the hearing presided by the single "designated member" which has been conducted as a customary practice in every case of the Osaka Expropriation Committee, and concludes that the practice is unconstitutional, illegal, or at least irrational.

2017-10-26 17:45:11
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110000213675

1 0 0 0 OA 新たな学習英文法構築のための基礎的研究

著者: 八木克正井上亜依磯辺ゆかり
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日: 2008

本研究の目的は、学習英文法の内容を根本的に見直し、科学的根拠を与えることにあった。好ましくない有害な英語教育の内容を洗い出すこと、変化する英語をphraseologyの立場から実態調査と分析を行い、あらたな事実を記述・説明すること、今の英語の実態を反映していない中学校や高等学校の学習内容、受験参考書や英和辞典の内容を、科学的な実態調査をもとに修正を求めるための研究活動を行い、いずれの点についても講演、論文、研究発表、著書の形で成果を公表した。

2017-10-22 16:41:00
1 知恵袋

https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-20320089/

1 0 0 0 IR 英語の変化と辞書記述(巻下吉夫教授退職記念号)

著者: 八木克正
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: Ex : エクス : 言語文化論集
巻号頁・発行日: vol.5, pp.19-30, 2007

2017-10-22 16:41:00
1 知恵袋

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006483035

1 0 0 0 OA <研究>キャッシュ・フロー分析の一視点 : E. S. ヘンドリクセン教授の所説を中心として

著者: 梶浦昭友
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 関西学院商学研究 (ISSN:03871606)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.7, pp.1-18, 1978-09-10

2017-09-15 19:45:10
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110000051115

1 0 0 0 IR 国木田独歩『酒中日記』論 : 今蔵の日記を読む記者の視点に着目して

著者: 弥頭直哉
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 日本文藝研究 (ISSN:02869136)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.55, no.3, pp.39-54, 2003-12-10

2017-09-09 16:31:02
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110002556696

1 0 0 0 コミュニティ実践の今日的課題 : 近年のソーシャル・アクションの動向

著者: 加山弾
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 関西学院大学社会学部紀要 (ISSN:04529456)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.95, pp.203-215, 2003-10-28

Nowadays the social action model of community practice in social work tends to be considered old-fashioned, because of the tendency that many people recently do not prefer using what used to be the standard methods of conflict and confrontation to assert their rights. However, such kinds of social action are still required in litigant's activities such as in the cases of Hansen's disease, HIV, and so on. This study attempts to make a presentation of a hypothetical model of current forms of social action. This model is tested using four cases. They are activities: (case 1) against pollution; (case 2) to change the government's principle on a new law providing services for disabled people; (case 3) for education and enlightenment about the environment; (case 4) to stop the closure of a nursing school for children with disabilities. Cases 1 and 2 were carried into practice according to the conventional method of social action, so in this meaning these two were similar. However, a difference was seen in that case 1 was for people in a specific geographic area, while case 2 was not. On the other hand, cases 3 and 4 had similar characteristics because they were quite different from the conventional social action; they were carried out with moderation after a term of confrontation. Although case 3 was for a generic area, case 4 was for a specific location. A framework for analysis of social action was derived through this argument: axes of confrontation-cooperation (the basic structure of relationships between the people concerned and their target), and specific-generic (the geographic area for intervention). Possibly this framework can be used by social workers to choose the appropriate social action method.