著者
李 政元
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
若手研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2010

本研究の目的は、公開されている児童虐待刑事裁判例に計量的分析を施し、児童虐待発生の背景にある要因を探索することである。51件の判例データ(テキスト・データ)を形態素に分解し、類似形態素毎にカテゴリー化を行い、カテゴリー間の共機関係をカテゴリカル主成分分析およびクラスター分析により検討した。その結果、51件の児童虐待事案については、致死に至る場合には、片親および無職者の有無が関連していることが示唆された。
著者
八木 克正
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
言語と文化 = 語言与文化 (ISSN:13438530)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.9, pp.1-17, 2006-03-01

This study is a critical review on the theories widely (and erroneously) held on adverbials very and much from the perspective of semantic syntax, which I first advocated in Yagi (1999). Since then I have published many articles to prove its validity as a theory of linguistic analysis of English. Those articles cover such wide range of areas as syntax and semantics of predicative adjectives, predicative nouns, verb complementation, and such phraseological units as "pretty much," "forget it" and "forget about it," and "but also." This article has double purposes: to disprove the various fallacies about very and much, on one hand, and to prove the validity of the theory of semantic syntax on the other. An example of erroneous views on very and much is that, in the case of -ed pre-modification by much or very, very modifies adjectives and therefore -ed's modified by very are adjectives, while much modifies the past participle of the verb and the -ed's modified by much are therefore verbs in their past participle forms. Thus, the concerned in Jane is very concerned about her son is an adjective because it is modified by very, while the concerned in Jane is much concerned with appearances is the past participle of the verb concern because it is modified by much. This kind of theory, because it disregards the semantic aspects of very and much, explains very little about English grammar. It is apparent that much and very have many aspects of contrast in their syntactic behavior, and their analyses and discussions have their foci on their syntactic differences. It seems almost impossible, however, to uniformly explain why they behave so differently in syntax without taking their semantic differences into consideration. Semantic syntax is concerned with how meaning, which is not directly observable, is represented in directly observable syntactic forms. If a grammatical theory does not refer to the meanings of syntactic forms, its significance is greatly reduced. Language is not so semantically vacuous as to allow us to find explanations only in syntax. This paper explains how very and much, especially "very much" as a phraseological unit, are semantically different and, therefore, how they behave syntactically differently.
著者
対馬 路人
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
一般研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
1995

特に中国(台湾)系の民衆宗教の代表的教団、紅卍字会道院系及び一貫道系の団体に絞って、資料収集をおこなうともに、それらの日本での活動について聴取調査、参与観察をおこなった。いまのところ、日本国内では前者の系統に関しては日本道院、多摩道院の二団体、後者に関しては天道総天壇、天道日本総天壇、先天大道日本総天壇、孔孟聖道院、道徳会館、中国嵩山少林寺(活動休止)の六団体の存在が確認された。これらの分立状況は母国におけるこれらの教団の分立を背景としている。調査を通して、これらの団体の日本への浸透の経緯や日本での活動の実態については、全ての団体に関してというわけではないが、ある程度明らかになった。歴史的にはまず紅卍字会道院が、日本の大本数と提携するという特異なしかたで戦前に日本に入った。一貫道系が日本に入るのは戦後になってからであり、しかも活発になったのは比較的最近のことである。一貫道系の団体の多くは台湾から入っているが(一団体は韓国経由)、台湾におけるこれらの団体の活発な布教活動を背景としていると思われる。しかし両系統の団体とも日本人メンバーが中心となって活動しているというという点では共通している。こうした中国系の宗教結社は外地では華人のエスニックな相互扶助団体になる傾向があることを考慮すると、この点は日本での展開の特徴の一つといえる。特に菜食の実践、瞑想などの修行の面では日本の若者の姿が目立つ。日本の若者の間での精神世界への関心の高まりがこれらを受け入れる日本側の土壌となっている面がみられる。これらの中国系民衆宗教は、シャーマンの託宣による教団指導、諸教融合的傾向など日本のそれと共通の体質を少なからずもっているが、日本のそれらと比べると、全体として禁欲主義、現世超越、秘密主義の傾向がやや強いように思われる。これらの団体が日本に受容される際に、それらがどのように作用するかを更に検討していきたい。
著者
田中 茂樹
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
法と政治 (ISSN:02880709)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.33, no.3, pp.493-520, 1982-11-15

1. Preface 2. Being legally obliged and Legal Obligation 3. The Recognition of Legal Obligation 4. Obligation and Sanction or Coercion 5. The Binding Character of Obligatory Rule and Ought In this essay I shall examine a new theory on legal obligation, which is presented by Professor H. L. A. Hart and the Ordinary Language School. Japanese legal philosophy has received and criticized H. Kelsen's notion of Ought (Sollen). So Hart's attempt to reconstruct Kelsen's notion of Ought and Basic Norm (Grundnorm) is fresh and interesting. But Hart's notion of legal obligation is not so clear to elucidate the relation between coercive force and legal obligation in a legal system.
著者
アクロイド ピーター・R. 向井 考史
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
神學研究 (ISSN:05598478)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.32, pp.143-167, 1984-03-31
著者
岡本 仁宏
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
法と政治 (ISSN:02880709)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.40, no.1, pp.81-157, 1989-03-20

This essay is a commentary on the situation of theoretical debates about the American "Progressive" era. Of course this era, about 1900-1920,is represented by the name of the two presidents, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. This essay has mainly two subjects. One is to review the recent interpretations of historical meaning of this era and the other is to search for clues to analyse the political thought of this era, particularly focusing on what is called the republican tradition. In the beginning of the first chapter, many historical interpretations by the end of the 1960s on the progressive era are sketched in one table, which includes some key terms of the "progressive", the "concensus", the "new left" and the "organizational" schools. And then among various interpretations after 1970,views of two historians, D. T. Rodgers and R. L. McCormick, are summarised and briefly reviewed on thier trait. In thier views, the contemporary political process and structure with pressure groups and enormous bureaucracys originate in this era. Thier views are remarkable in that thier frames of recognition are deeply influenced by theories of mordern political sciense. Their views leads to understanding the political thinking of this era as various expressions of distress and agony in the emerging process of the contemporary society. In the second chapter, among diverse arguable themes we pick up a theme of the political tradition of republicanism. The problem of republicanism in American political tradition is an important and hotly controversial issue. The dominant position of the liberal tradition in America (L. Harts) has been attacked by proponents of the republican tradition and vice versa. Referring to works of J. G. A. Pocock, J. P. Diggins, R. N. Bellah, D. Ross and so on, this essay describes what influence of republicanism can be discovered in the progressive political thought. Then some other related issues are commented, including historical conciousness in comparative point of view.
著者
冨田 宏治
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
法と政治 (ISSN:02880709)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.57, no.2, pp.111-148, 2006-06

2. Modern Japan as Visualized Empire Modern Japan and Modernity of M. Foucault Tennou's Pageantry and Visual Domination Visualized Empire and Visual Domination Historical Precedent of Visual Domination
著者
森脇 俊雅
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
法と政治 (ISSN:02880709)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.36, no.2, pp.201-240, 1985-06-20

Introduction I. What Is Collective Action Problem? II. Discussions of Collective Action Problem (1) Political Entrepreneur (2) Game Theoretic Analysis (3) Some Criticisms III. Political Implications of Collective Action Problem
著者
古家 弘幸 古家 弘幸
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
經濟學論究 (ISSN:02868032)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.2, pp.85-103, 2007-02

Thomas Hepburn is an eighteenth-century Presbyterian minister whose tract translated here presents a fine example of the work in political economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. In it Hepburn acutely analyses the main causes of the poverty of the Orkney Islands, a remote area of Scotland where he served for nearly two decades. His main purpose was to defend the Earl of Morton, a Scottish nobleman who had been involved in a bitterly-fought epic court case called the 'Pundlar Process', about tyranny and oppression with which he had been charged by his own vassals. Hepburn in the end remits the Earl of Morton, citing many reasons why the Islands were suffering from poverty, other than the alleged tyranny and oppression. Hepburn is now an overlooked and almost forgotten figure who nonetheless shows how political economy characteristically emerged in the Scottish Enlightenment out of eighteenth-century British political culture and legal contexts.
著者
古家 弘幸 古家 弘幸
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
經濟學論究 (ISSN:02868032)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.1, pp.77-97, 2006-09

Thomas Hepburn is an eighteenth-century Presbyterian minister whose tract translated here presents a fine example of the work in political economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. In it Hepburn acutely analyses the main causes of the poverty of the Orkney Islands, a remote area of Scotland where he served for nearly two decades. His main purpose was to defend the Earl of Morton, a Scottish nobleman who had been involved in a bitterly-fought epic court case called the 'Pundlar Process', about tyranny and oppression with which he had been charged by his own vassals. Hepburn in the end remits the Earl of Morton, citing many reasons why the Islands were suffering from poverty, other than the alleged tyranny and oppression. Hepburn is now an overlooked and almost forgotten figure who nonetheless shows how political economy characteristically emerged in the Scottish Enlightenment out of eighteenth-century British political culture and legal contexts.
著者
甲斐 知彦 佐藤 博信 河鰭 一彦 林 直也
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
スポーツ科学・健康科学研究 (ISSN:13440349)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.10, pp.9-14, 2007-02

The purpose of this study was to examine the change of Self-concept of undergraduates who participated in a camping intensive course. There were 28 subjects of both sexes. For a questionnaire, the self Enhancement Scale created by Kajita was used. The survey was conducted on the undergraduates before and after the camp. As a result, the following findings were obtained: 1) The self-growth points of undergraduates who had participated in the Camping Intensive course increased after the camp. Thus, the Camping Intensive course had helped to improve their self-concept.2) "Effortism," a component of self-concept, increased dramatically after the camp (P<0.05) .3) As a result of a factor analysis of the study results, we were able to sample the four factors of "achievement motivation and self-confidence," "inferiority complex," "effort/challenge," and "other-consciousness." 4) After the camp, we observed a decline in the rank of the "achievement motivation and self-confidence factor" and a rise in the ranks of the "inferiority complex factor" and "effort/challenge factor."
著者
閨 正博
出版者
関西学院大学
巻号頁・発行日
1990

博士論文