著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF EDUCATIONAL SOCIOLOGY
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.94, pp.5-24, 2014

「ポストモダン」論によって影響を受けた1980年代後半の日本の教育社会学を「ポストモダン教育社会学」と呼ぶことにする。それは,「モダン」としての教育・学校制度の異化に向かったが,アリエス,ブルデューと並んでインスピレーションの供給源となったのが,『監獄の誕生』におけるフーコーの「規律訓練」の視点であった。しかし,1990年代以降の教育システムの変動によって,異化の手法で捉えられた教育・学校制度の理解は不十分なものとなり,ポストモダン教育社会学の訴求力も低下していく。他方,フーコー研究においては,2000年代以降,規律訓練の概念が「生政治」論の一部であることが明らかになるのだが,1990年代以降の教育システムは,まさにこの生政治論的視点からよりよく捉えうることをフーコー理論を概略しながら論じた。
著者
川村 光 紅林 伸幸 越智 康詞 加藤 隆雄 中村 瑛仁 長谷川 哲也 藤田 武志 油布 佐和子
出版者
関西国際大学
雑誌
研究紀要 (ISSN:13455311)
巻号頁・発行日
no.17, pp.51-71, 2016-03-31

The purpose of this study is to analyze Japanese teachers’ viewpoints relating toJapanese society and education based on the data of quantitative investigation of public primary school and junior high school teachers in 2013.From this survey, some important findings were drawn. First, the characteristics of teachers who take an optimistic view of the future Japanese society is that the level of their consciousness of the autonomy of the profession is lower. Second, the characteristics of teachers whose consciousness of the autonomy of the profession is lower are that the level of their consciousness of the training of pupils in 21 century academic abilities is lower and they are not ready to carry out the individual and clinical education that help teachers cope with the reality of pupils in their educational practice. Third, the teachers who are school middle leaders in schools are the ones “accomplishing their duty of the school organization”type, who positively carry out school and lesson reform. Also this trend in younger generation is higher. Especially, the characteristics of the school middle leaders is the important issue to consider for the future school education.
著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
日本教育社会学会
雑誌
日本教育社会学会大会発表要旨集録
巻号頁・発行日
no.40, pp.2-3, 1988-10-14

エスノメソドロジーが対象としてきたのは、日常世界の自明視された領域であり、成員の日常的実践の形式的構造である。しかし、エスノメソドロジーは、実践形式が新参者を通して自身をいかに再生産するのかに関して、つまり成員の社会化過程に関しては、固有で定式化された回答を与えてこなかったように思われる。翻って社会化論も未だ十全にエスノメソドロジーの成果を取り込んではいない。本報告の目的は、エスノメソドロジーが社会化論に対してどのような視角を切り開いたのかを検討することにある。手順として、社会化論の立場からエスノメソドロジーの理論を本報告の趣旨に即して再構成し、それが提起した問題を定式化する。そして、エスノメソドロジーの知見は社会化論にいかなる意義を持つのかを述べる。
著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
日本教育社会学会
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.61, pp.5-24, 1997-10-15 (Released:2011-03-18)
参考文献数
37
被引用文献数
2

Why does traditional femininity persist even though women seemingly have become free from traditional constraints? The types of answers to this question are that women adopt traditional femininity by (1) compulsory selection;(2) rational selection;(3) subjective selection;(4) unconscious selection. Each of these is insufficient. This paper suggests some integrated vision for this problem by focusing on the female culture (of younger women), especially its property as capital. Data from the survey reveals the ingredients of the female culture:(a) consummatory factor, (b) domestic factor, and (c) girls' culture factor. Each of them is related to traditional femininity through the DELAY-FUNCTION and the TRANFORMATIVE-FUNCTION (of meaning). The subjectively experienced meaning of the female culture are delay-transformed for reasons of the resemblance of the appearance to the factors of traditional femininity. This function can be precisely formulated as the function of HABITUS (Pierre Bourdieu's term). But Bourdieu did not explain habitus in the context of femininity and women's deprivation. So an extended concept for femininity is required. Habitus is the incarnated form of the capital (Bourdieu especially insisted capital culturel, i. e. CULTURAL CAPITAL). And this capital functions only in the FIELD (“Champ”) that is correlated and reflexively defined with capital. I named such FIELD as related women's properties as “PATRIARCHAL FIELD”, and its correlated capital as “PATRIARCHAL CAPITAL”. The patriarchal capital, as with other forms of capital such as cultural capital, economic capital and social capital, produces profits only within its field, and converts former forms into another. This process corresponds to the transformative function.Female culture and gender formation of women can be interpreted by Bourdieu's model. And this model will be able to explicate the hidden process of “the reproduction of gender” by the analysis of the conversion of and between such capital as discussed above.
著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
日本教育社会学会
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.94, pp.5-24, 2014-05-31 (Released:2015-06-03)
参考文献数
49

「ポストモダン」論によって影響を受けた1980年代後半の日本の教育社会学を「ポストモダン教育社会学」と呼ぶことにする。それは,「モダン」としての教育・学校制度の異化に向かったが,アリエス,ブルデューと並んでインスピレーションの供給源となったのが,『監獄の誕生』におけるフーコーの「規律訓練」の視点であった。しかし,1990年代以降の教育システムの変動によって,異化の手法で捉えられた教育・学校制度の理解は不十分なものとなり,ポストモダン教育社会学の訴求力も低下していく。他方,フーコー研究においては,2000年代以降,規律訓練の概念が「生政治」論の一部であることが明らかになるのだが,1990年代以降の教育システムは,まさにこの生政治論的視点からよりよく捉えうることをフーコー理論を概略しながら論じた。
著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
東洋館
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
no.61, pp.5-24, 1997-10

Why does traditional femininity persist even though women seemingly have become free from traditional constraints? The types of answers to this question are that women adopt traditional femininity by (1) compulsory selection; (2) rational selection; (3) subjective selection; (4) unconscious selection. Each of these is insufficient. This paper suggests some integrated vision for this problem by focusing on the female culture (of younger women), especially its property as capital. Data from the survey reveals the ingredients of the female culture: (a) consummatory factor, (b) domestic factor, and (c) girls' culture factor. Each of them is related to traditional femininity through the DELAY-FUNCTION and the TRANFORMATIVE-FUNCTION (of meaning). The subjectively experienced meaning of the female culture are delay-transformed for reasons of the resemblance of the appearance to the factors of traditional femininity. This function can be precisely formulated as the function of HABITUS (Pierre Bourdieu's term). But Bourdieu did not explain habitus in the context of femininity and women's deprivation. So an extended concept for femininity is required. Habitus is the incarnated form of the capital (Bourdieu especially insisted "capital culturel", i.e. CULTURAL CAPITAL). And this capital functions only in the FIELD ("Champ") that is correlated and reflexively defined with capital. I named such FIELD as related women's properties as "PATRIARCHAL FIELD", and its correlated capital as "PATRIARCHAL CAPITAL". The patriarchal capital, as with other forms of capital such as cultural capital, economic capital and social capital, produces profits only within its field, and converts former forms into another. This process corresponds to the transformative function. Female culture and gender formation of women can be interpreted by Bourdieu's model. And this model will be able to explicate the hidden process of "the reproduction of gender" by the analysis of the conversion of and between such capital as discussed above.
著者
越智 康詞 菊地 栄治 加藤 隆雄 吉原 惠子
出版者
東京大学教育学部
雑誌
東京大学教育学部紀要 (ISSN:04957849)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.32, pp.119-146, 1993-03-30

Many gender studies are based on the concept of patriarchy which stresses the dichotomous distinction between women and men and which focuses on men's domination over women. But, in reality, women cannot be understood by the single category of "women" which is implicitly presupposed in the theory of patriarchy. They consist of multiple and differentiated layers. And the mechanisms through which femininity and domesticity are produced and reproduced should be reconsidered from the point of both feminine culture and the pratique or strategic actions of women. In this paper, the data from the survey of the women undergraduate students (for details, see Section I) are analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. In Section II, quantitative data are analyzed from the viewpoints of feminine socialization and housework practices (chapter A), feminine culture of consumption, domesticity and object-favoritism (chapter B), relationships between marital and professional perspectives (chapter C) and "conservatization" by two types of feminine strategic actions (chapter D). In Section III, the qualitative data (free description) are analyzed concerning the future expectation (chapter A), advantageous and disadvantageous experiences of being women (chapter B), and transformation of notions about males and marriage (chapter C). The perspective of "differentiation and ambivalence of femininity" is effective to analyze the (post-) modern gender relations.
著者
加藤 隆雄
出版者
日本教育社会学会
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.43, pp.136-147, 1988-10-03

Socialization is one of the most important mechanisms in social theory, but socialization theory has scarcely progressed in the past twenty years and the concept of "socialization" has become hollow. The main cause of this stagnation is that socialization has been explained by "internalization", especially by the theories of Parsons and Berger and Luckmann. They all suppose that society and individuals will be connected if individuals internalize the set of values or the signification system. But if internalization means something more than, for example, "acquisition", then what is "the interior"? We have found several inconsistencies if supposing "the interior" is the agent for socialization. We must consider that socialization is no longer an internal affair but is an "external" process, and, as such, socialization must have a societal character. Indeed, internalization is not necessary for the major processes of socialization such as language acquisition, role-taking or imitation and playing games. These are types of interaction, and the child must perform the interaction well with others (mostly its mother). This is what is called Sprachspiel. We can understand the existence of the "take-for-granted" region of everyday life if socialization is accomplished by "social preconsciousness". It functions so as to articulate the types of interaction, i.e. Sprachspiel. The investigation of this preconsciousness will bring us the field of ≪meso-sociology≫.