著者
[大河内秀元 筆記]
出版者
諸芸新報社
巻号頁・発行日
vol.初編, 1882
著者
松浦 正伸
出版者
一般財団法人 日本国際政治学会
雑誌
国際政治
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2017, no.187, pp.187_80-187_96, 2017

<p>How do we apply history in politics? The purpose of this paper is to analyze how recognition in civil society, such as perception of history, plays a role in public opinion and parliamentary government. To clarify this research question, incorporating a political concept into the analysis, this paper focused on roles of the General Association of Korean Residents (Chongryon) and the North Korean Lobby and looked into the backgrounds in the repatriation massively expanded between 1959 and 1961.</p><p>Before repatriation movements started, changes of organization structures were observed in the Chongryon and they began to speak in favor of North Korea. Simultaneously, the nature of the Niccho-Kyokai (日朝協会), which had been taking a politically neutral position, also began to change. They began to be a lobbying group in order to support the North Korean foreign diplomacy against Japan.</p><p>Applying a concept of "Pseudo Environment" defined by Walter Lippmann as a subjective, biased, and abridged mental image of the world, this section reflected on influences of the two key players over North Korean residents in Japan and Japanese public opinion. The analysis found a social trend with regards to repatriation issues being manipulated by a correlation of three components in the Pseudo Environment: (1) unified perception of history, (2) motherland-oriented nationalism, and (3) economic rationality.</p><p>Based on a data-mining method, the influences of the Pseudo Environment in the Diet were analyzed. The penetration of such an environment into civil society assisted the Diet members with the repatriation project being recognized ethically and humanitarianly. Therefore, intentions of the North Korean strategies against South Korea were insufficiently discussed.</p><p>The Pseudo Environment lost its effect as (1) demand of mobilization was weakened, (2) activities were diversified among the North Korean Lobby, and (3) information about North Korea was brought by returnees, and gaps were gradually closed between the Pseudo Environment and reality.</p><p>As a result of the Pseudo Environment effectively created by the two players among the North Korean residents in Japan and in the Japanese public opinion, one-sided recognition of North Korean strategies influenced civil society and parliamentary government to bring the mass repatriation out. This analysis also concludes that a nation is capable of controlling a social trend in other countries via intermediaries from outside of its country taking advantage of certain recognition. When we see international relations in East Asia, perception of history is an ongoing issue and has been more complex. This indicates that more case studies will be expected on how history has been utilized in politics.</p>
著者
武井 弘一
出版者
九州大学基幹教育院
雑誌
鷹・鷹場・環境研究 (ISSN:24328502)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1, pp.3-17, 2017-03-25

小稿の目的は、絵画資料を分析しながら、江戸時代の水田と、それを取り巻く自然環境を明らかにすることである。江戸時代の17 世紀は、新田開発の時代である。平野部には水田が広がり、生産されたコメが社会を支えた。国全体の財政システムも、コメが基準とされた。その結果、人口が急激に増加し、社会は経済成長を成し遂げた。ところで、水田は、人間の視点に立てば、コメを生産する場である。だが、生き物の視点に立てば、水田は水辺でもある。水辺には、動物や鳥、魚などの多様な生き物が生息する。たとえば、イノシシ、シカ、タカ、ツル、コイ、へピ、カエノレなどの名があげられよう。江戸時代には、現代のような生き物を殺す農薬が使われていなかった。したがって、水田が広がったということは、水辺の生き物も増えたことを意味しよう。はたして、水田は生き物を増やしたのか。これを検証するために、江戸中期の農村の風景が描かれた絵農書『農業図絵』をとりあげる。この絵に描かれている生き物に注目し、水田の生態系を復原し、江戸時代の自然環境を明らかにする。The purpose of this study is to show ways in which paddy fields transformed the natural environment during the Edo period by analyzing pictures drawn in that period in cultivators' agricultural manuals. The 17th century was a time of extensive reclaiming of land and construction of paddy fields in Japan. There was an enormous expansion of paddy fields on the plain with a corresponding increase in rice and other crop output, sufficient to contribute to increased commercial sale of crops. As a result, the population increased rapidly, but also experienced considerable economic growth. While the paddy field is a place to produce rice from the human viewpoint, from the viewpoint of the creatures and naturally growing plants, the paddy field is a waterside environment, too. Various creatures such as large and small animals, birds or fishes inhabit this environment, e.g., wild boars, deer, hawks, cranes, carp, snakes, frogs, and more. In the cultivated area, no pesticide was applied which might have poisoned such creatures. Therefore, the creation of paddy generated a new environment in which waterside creatures increased along with the construction of paddies in the Edo period. Did the number and variety of such creatures associated with paddy field really increase? I will investigate this question by analyzing Nōgyō-zue that depicted the scenery of the farm villages of the middle in the Edo period. I will pay attention to creatures drawn in these pictures to clarify the relationship between rural animal life in the Edo period and the ecosystem of the paddy field.
著者
池田 真利子
出版者
公益社団法人 日本地理学会
雑誌
E-journal GEO (ISSN:18808107)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.11, no.1, pp.164-185, 2016-09-30 (Released:2016-10-11)
参考文献数
60

本稿の目的は,EUおよびドイツにおける文化創造産業(以下,KKW)政策の策定経緯を注視しつつ,特に5州(N=W,ハンブルク,ブレーメン,ベルリン,ザクセン)のKKW産業構造と空間的特性をみることにより,ドイツのKKW政策の特徴を検討することにある.ドイツにおけるKKWは,経済危機時の経済的安定性や,欧州文化首都等,創造都市への国際的機運の高まりを背景に新しい産業としての認識が高まった.ドイツのKKW政策は,特に都市空間との関連性が顕著であり,都市経済および都市構造への影響と多分に関わると推測される.