ランキング (合計) - Ceek.jp Altmetrics

Moritaro Yamada's "Nihon Shihonshugi Bunseki (Analysis of Japanese Capitalism)" (1934), hereafter "Bunseki," is a classic that has had an great impact on Japan's social science since the 1930s. It is difficult to understand the author's true intent, however, because he used obscure language, in order to avoid censorship by the authoritarian government. The book is principally composed of three volumes that were originally part of "Nihon Shihonshugi Hattatsushi Koza (Lectures on the Development of Japanese Capitalism)" (1932-1933), hereafter "Koza." We are now able to compare the "Bunseki" and "Koza" manuscripts because they were recently donated to the Institute of Social Science at the University of Tokyo. The other Moritaro Yamada's collections are at the Archive for the Faculty of Economics at the University of Tokyo, the Institute of Social Science at Senshu University and the Library of Ryukoku University, with both of which Yamada was affiliated. It is important to compare the various manuscripts of "Bunseki" and "Koza", and particularly the "Koza" manuscripts with the published version, in order to establish an evidentiary basis for the retrospective examination of Yamada's theory and analysis. This article collates the differences between the manuscript and published versions of "Koza" where they are most divergent in content, as shown in Table 1 and 2. These Tables enable us to understand the author's intention regarding a substantial portion of the complicated terminology used in "Koza" and "Bunseki." Some results of collation are as follows. First, the original title of "Bunseki" was "Nihon Shihonshugi (tokuni Kogyo) Bunseki (Analysis of Japanese Capitalism [Especially Industry])." Secondly, the third section, 'Kitei (The Basis),' which has received particular recognition, was initially titled 'Yohen (Appendix)'. Thridly, in 'Jogen (Introduction),' which compared the characteristics of Japanese capitalism with that of other countries, the author defined by 'revolution' and 'capitalism' at the beginning, and then went on to clarify by 'absolutism' and 'land ownership.' Lastly, the author changed his wording, especially in relation to 'Military', 'Police', 'Imperial Court', and 'Labor Struggle', to other unique complicated terminologies.

2017-08-24 16:53:59
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110010033098

1 0 0 0 「国連中心主義」の起源 (特集主要国の国際秩序観と現代外交)

著者: 苅部直
出版者: 木鐸社
雑誌: レヴァイアサン (ISSN:13438166)
巻号頁・発行日: no.58, pp.49-67, 2016

2017-08-24 16:53:02
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020838281

1 0 0 0 ソ連の対外膨張政策をめぐる日本言論界の動向 : ソ連・フィンランド戦争(冬戦争)期を中心に

著者: 多比羅充
出版者: 日本政治経済史学研究所
雑誌: 政治経済史学 (ISSN:02864266)
巻号頁・発行日: no.591, pp.13-36, 2016-03

2017-08-24 16:52:08
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40021052249

1 0 0 0 IR 日本陸軍と「北方問題」 : ドイツ西方攻勢から日ソ中立条約まで

著者: 滝田遼介
出版者: 慶應義塾大学大学院法学研究科内『法学政治学論究』刊行会
雑誌: 法学政治学論究 : 法律・政治・社会 (ISSN:0916278X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.110, pp.135-169, 2016

一課題と分析の視角二国際情勢変動と「北方問題」 (一) 一九三九年秋期の対外情勢変動 (二) ドイツ西方攻勢と「時局処理要綱」の形成三「北方問題」をめぐる認識と戦略 (一) 対ソ脅威認識の継続 (二) 松岡外交の展開と陸軍の対応 (三) 《南方処理重視論》と《北方処理重視論》 (四) 実現されざる「北方の安全」四結論