著者

山田 忠彰

出版者

日本ヘーゲル学会

雑誌

ヘーゲル哲学研究 (ISSN:13423703)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2004, no.10, pp.74-78, 2004-12-24 (Released:2010-07-27)

参考文献数

9

著者

山田 圭一

出版者

The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan

雑誌

科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.44, no.1, pp.1_35-1_47, 2011 (Released:2011-10-13)

参考文献数

12

---

Until now, Many philosophers have tried to elucidate plurality of epistemic norms in terms of plurality of aims with which we acquire knowledge. In this paper, I try to elucidate them in terms of plurality of aims with which we evaluate knowledge. For this purpose, I construct the new knowledge model which is composed of the idea of Attributor Contextualism and the conception of language games by Wittgenstein. With this model, I want to suggest a new research program of epistemology which can contain both Internalism and Externalism that have caused a lot of controversy in contemporary epistemology.

著者

山田 友幸

出版者

The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan

雑誌

科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.41, no.2, pp.2_59-2_73, 2008 (Released:2009-08-31)

参考文献数

19

---

Inspired by the recent development of dynamic epistemic logics, an investigation into logical dynamics of speech acts has been launched and a few logics have already been developed. We will review closely logics that deal with acts of commanding and promising, and show how they can capture the conventional effects of these illocutionary acts. We will also take a quick look at other logics that deal with perlocutionary acts of preference upgrading, and illocutionary acts of asserting, conceding, and withdrawing, and then conclude with a brief discussion of remaining problems and prospects for further research.

著者

山田 慶一

出版者

日本文学協会

雑誌

日本文学 (ISSN:03869903)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.4, no.6, pp.420, 1955-06-01 (Released:2017-08-01)

著者

山田 八千子

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2006, pp.84-99,265, 2007-10-30 (Released:2010-12-16)

参考文献数

26

---

New legal training system was established at 2004. It organically connects legal education, the national bar examination and legal training as a “process”. Law school system would be its core. Law schools have to provide the education especially for training for the legal professions (judges, prosecutors, and lawyers). Therefore the education at law school should build a bridge between theoretical education and practical education. This paper would examine that the subject of legal philosophy plays an crucial role in such new legal training system. Legal education would be classified into two categories. These categories are the rationalistic theoretical education and the apprentice education as apprenticeship. In Japan the undergraduate schools and the postgraduate schools have given great deal of weight to the rationalistic theoretical education. But not only the theoretical education but also the apprentice education are indispensable for the education for legal professions.

著者

山田 八千子

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2004, pp.88-104,202, 2005-09-30 (Released:2008-11-17)

参考文献数

19

---

In this paper I presuppose that liberty has a structure. Such structure of liberty also exits in private law. I would especially deal with some issues of contract law. Contract law is the core in libertarian legal theory. That is a reason why I focus on contract law. Libertarians respect the principle of freedom of contract. This is one of main principles of so called “classical private theory” or classical contract theory. By contrast, modern contract law is based on Welfarism which is criticized by libertarian in general. If modern contract theory is in harmony with Welfarism, it seems that libertarianism contributes not to these field of modern contract law theory. But I believe that it is a misunderstanding about libertarianism. We should explore practical implication of libertarianism for modern contract law. I argue that libertarianism provide useful suggestions for resolving a number of problems that modern contract law theory have to cope with. Firstly I indicate a number of dilemmas in modern contract law as follows. Although in modern contract law “consent by parties” would be often regulated for weaker parties, such regulations are not necessary produce the desired result. This is the point of libertarian argument. For instance, I refer to an example with regard to a relation between landlord and tenant in Land and House Lease Law in Japan. Secondly I explain libertarian arguments about “the nature of market order” and “the knowledge of the circumstance in market”. Indeed there are substantial differences in knowledge between consumer and company. But such differences are not necessary good reason to intervene to market. According to libertarian argument, market order is one of spontaneous order. So the knowledge never exists in concentrated, integrated form. If we wish to make good use of such knowledge in market, we have to take seriously the libertarian theory.

著者

山田 秀

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1996, pp.137-146, 1997-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)

参考文献数

21

著者

山田 八千子

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1992, pp.191-199, 1993-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)

参考文献数

8

著者

山田 秀

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1985, pp.108-117, 1986-10-20 (Released:2009-02-12)

参考文献数

10

著者

山田 朋奈 李 鎔範 長谷川 晃

出版者

医用画像情報学会

雑誌

医用画像情報学会雑誌 (ISSN:09101543)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.36, no.2, pp.83-87, 2019-06-30 (Released:2019-06-28)

参考文献数

19

---

The purpose of this paper is to develop a computerized classification method for right or left and directions of arms in forearm X-ray images using a deep convolutional neural network(DCNN). 648 radiographs were obtained by using X-ray lower arm phantoms. These images were downsized to 213×256 pixels and used as training and test images in the DCNN. AlexNet and GoogLeNet were used as the DCNN. All radiographs were classified to eight categories by the DCNN. Classification accuracies were obtained by nine-fold cross validation tests. The accuracies using AlexNet and GoogLeNet were 79.3% and 92.6%, respectively. GoogLeNet would be useful to classify forearm radiographs automatically. The proposed method may contribute to quality assurance for medical images.

著者

山田 幸男

出版者

日本法哲学会

雑誌

法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1956, pp.85-110, 1957-04-30 (Released:2009-02-12)

参考文献数

17

著者

西山 邦隆 山田 和歌子

出版者

東北女子大学紀要編集委員会・東北女子短期大学紀要編集委員会

雑誌

東北女子大学・東北女子短期大学紀要 (ISSN:09142711)

巻号頁・発行日

no.51, pp.4-21, 2013-01-28

著者

山田 友幸

出版者

日本イギリス哲学会

雑誌

イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.4, pp.35-44, 1981-03-28 (Released:2018-06-25)

著者

山田俊弘 小澤実 河村豊 中尾暁 多久和俊明 隠岐さや香

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.295, pp.260-303, 2020 (Released:2021-01-24)

著者

青木滋之 矢島道子 山田俊弘

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.293, pp.69-71, 2020 (Released:2021-01-24)

著者

溝口元 中村士 山田俊弘 岡田大士 河村豊 渋谷一夫

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, no.291, pp.249-299, 2019 (Released:2021-01-24)

著者

山田 鋭夫

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, no.2, pp.57-59, 2017 (Released:2019-11-30)

著者

山田 鋭夫 Robert Chapeskie

出版者

The Japanease Society for the History of Economic Thought

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, no.2, pp.1-23, 2017 (Released:2019-08-31)

被引用文献数

3

---

Introduction by Toshio Yamada This text was originally a chapter in Yoshihiko Uchidaʼs (1913-1989) first book, The Birth of Economic Science (hereafter referred to as “Birth”), Tokyo: Mirai-sha Publishers, 1953, and was later included in Collected Works of Yoshi-hiko Uchida, vol. 1, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, Publishers, 1989. Birth was pub-lished eight years after Japanʼs defeat in World War II, in the era of chaos and hope that followed this conflict. It has been widely read by generations of social scientists, and is now considered one of the greatest masterpieces in the study of Adam Smith in Japan. Following its somewhat lengthy “Introduction,” Uchidaʼs Birth is construct-ed in two parts: Part One, “The Birth of Economic Science: Wealth of Nations as a Critique of the Old Imperial System” and Part Two, “Analysis of the Sys-tem of Wealth of Nations.” In Part One, Uchida depicts the birth of economic science in Smith not as an extension of political economy after the mercantile system but rather as a critical response to the examination of civil society found in thinkers such as John Locke, David Hume and above all Jean-Jacques Rous-seau, thus bringing into sharp relief Adam Smith as a thinker who criticized mercantilist “modernization from above.” In Part Two, starting with an examina-tion of Smithʼs concept of civil society and theory of the division of labor, Uchi-da analyzes his theories of value, surplus value, and capital accumulation and reproduction by contrasting them with those of Karl Marx. For a more detailed outline of Birth, see Sakamoto (2017).

著者

山田 正範

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.57, no.1, pp.106-107, 2015 (Released:2019-11-26)

著者

山田 鋭夫

出版者

The Japanease Society for the History of Economic Thought

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.56, no.1, pp.1-20, 2014 (Released:2019-08-24)

---

Abstract: Hirata Kiyoaki is a representative historian of economic thought in postwar Japan, a renova-tor of Marxism, and, above all, a theoretician vis-à-vis civil society. The thinkers he principal-ly examined were Quesnay, Marx, and Gramsci. Through the study of these three theoreti-cians, his thinking on civil society germinated, fully developed, and finally experienced a sort of change. In this essay, I will follow the development of and changes in his theory, as well as his original and fundamental analytical approach with regard to economic society; in so do-ing, I wish to elucidate the contemporary significance and limits of his civil society theory. The original nature of Hirataʼs theory resides in the fact that he analyzes economic soci-ety from a “process and structure” approach. In early Hirataʼs study of Quesnay, this was ex-pressed in terms of the methodological pivot of the “circuit of productive capital and structure of reproduction,” leading to a solution of the so-called enigma of the Tableau économique. In middle-aged Hirataʼs study of Marx, he began to place the greatest analytical emphasis on the “capital circuit” or “process,” rather than on “structure.” This resulted in an exploration of problems pertaining to property: the inversion of the law of appropriation and the re-estab-lishment of individual property. Here we see the full development of his theory of civil socie-ty, which addressed many pressing questions posed with respect to actual issues of the times: civil society and community, civil society and capitalism, and civil society and socialism. Later-years Hirata adopted the Gramscian theory of hegemony, thus shifting his attention to a civil society theory that differed from that of his younger years. By stressing the Gramscian genealogy of the word régulation of the French régulation school, it seems that he had found in this concept his own approach to “process.” In other words, his initial approach to “structure,” another one in his younger days, may have gradually faded away, or his death may have hindered him from the active development of this approach. However, as a cost of it having not been developed, his thoughts on the “re-establishment of individual property”-which he substantiated as part of his approach to “process”-have become something that does retain universal value even today. JEL classification numbers: B 14, B 31, B 52.