著者
眞田 克 安富 泰輝
出版者
高知工科大学
雑誌
高知工科大学紀要 (ISSN:13484842)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.8, no.1, pp.49-56, 2011

不安定な出力論理を有するフローティング・ゲート故障に対して出力論理値を固定化する実験を行った。実験はゲートオープン故障を作り込んだInverter回路に外部からレーザを照射する方式である。その結果、出力論理は"H"固定した。同時にIDD値も変動した。この変動値は正常状態の特性の動作点に一致した。レーザ照射を止めると特性は元の状態に戻った。この現象を検証するためにゲート電極を共通にしたInverter回路の一方側にレーザを照射し他方側の出力を測定した。その結果"H"に固定した。この実験はレーザを照射することで形成される電子がフローティング・ゲート電極へ入り込み電圧を低下させていると考える。単体Trによるレーザ照射実験と合わせてこの現象を述べる。

1 0 0 0 霧の流れに

著者
清水 みのる[作詞]
出版者
テイチク
巻号頁・発行日
1948-12
著者
日向 滋 桜井 正幸 姫野 修廣 岩出 浩正
出版者
一般社団法人 日本機械学会
雑誌
日本機械学会論文集 B編 (ISSN:03875016)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.57, no.535, pp.971-976, 1991-03-25 (Released:2008-03-28)
参考文献数
14

The theoretical study was carried out to clarify the mechanism of bubble formation through a submerged nozzle in upward water flow. On the basis of the experimental results, a model of breakup of the air column in which the surface membrane is oscillating at the top of the nozzle due to the disturbance of flow was proposed. The size of the bubble generated from a nozzle in a stream ranging from Nozzle Reynolds number 1500 to 15000 was determined by applying the theory of the instability of a jet which was first analyzed by Lord Rayleigh. The proposed model is in good agreement with the experimental results.
著者
Satoru SUZUKI
出版者
Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
雑誌
Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science (ISSN:04530691)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.13, no.2, pp.105-126, 2005-03-05 (Released:2009-03-26)
参考文献数
22
被引用文献数
2 2

Bayesianism has the following two principles. (B1) Any rational belief state can be represented by a probability function. (B2) Any rational belief change can be represented by conditionalisation. Besides (B1) and (B2), Bayesian confirmation theory has the following principle. (B3) Evidence E confirms a theory T ⇔ the probability of T under the condition E is greater than the probability of T. Glymour argues about what he believes is a counterexample to (B3). When we represent by P the belief state of Einstein at a certain time in November 1915 and consider E to be old evidence for the general theory of relativity (GTR), we obtain P (E)=1. Then we obtain (1) P (GTR|E)=P (GTR). On the other hand, according to (B3), we obtain (2) P (GTR|E)>P (GTR). (2) contradicts (1). This is called the old evidence problem. Howson handles it as follows. The belief state of each agent at each time is relativised to the stock of background information which he has at the time. The reason why the old evidence problem arises is that we relativise the belief state of Einstein to the unsuitable stock of background information. Let K be the stock of background information which Einstein had at that time and let P be the probability function which represents the belief state relativised to the stock. When we choose this P in applying (B3), the old evidence problem arises. Let K_??_{(E)} be the result of deleting from K everything in K dependent on E and let P' be the probability function which represents the belief state relativised to K_??_{(E)}. Because P' (E)≠1, the old evidence problem does not arise. But as Chihara criticises, it is not clear what K_??_{(E)} and P' are like. I handle Chihara's criticism in terms of a probabilistic version of AGM theory. AGM theory can describe such types of belief changes as expansion, contraction and revision. I handle the old evidence problem by means of retaining (B1) and (B3) and relaxing (B2) so as to admit the type of belief change which can be represented by the change from P to P', that is, contraction. Following this line of thought, I show that we can consider P' to be the contraction of P with respect to E. Relying mainly on the writings of Gärdenfors and Spohn, I show that we can construct a probabilistic contraction function which generates the contraction of P with respect to E.
著者
入山 洋子
出版者
京都大学大学文書館
雑誌
京都大学大学文書館研究紀要 (ISSN:13489135)
巻号頁・発行日
no.19, pp.51-88, 2021-03-19
著者
渡部 治 Osamu Watabe
雑誌
国際経営・文化研究 = Cross-cultural business and cultural studies (ISSN:13431412)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.19, no.1, pp.179-185, 2015-03-01

In this paper the author explores the core of the thought of Ninomiya Sontoku (二宮尊徳) who is a person of agricultural administration of the Edo era (江戸時代).He had a superior pupil. It is Tomita Kokei (富田高慶), Fukuzumi Masae (福住正兄), and Saito Takayuki (斎藤高行). Sontoku made much of experience. It was his conclusion as the farmer. The author seeks to uncover personality of Sontoku paying attention for their writing about the Life of Sontoku.