ランキング (合計) - Ceek.jp Altmetrics

This paper aims to examine the history of Vietnam's "external" relations in a new perspective, especially with regard to its southern and western neighbors after its independence in the tenth century. As for its neighbor in the south, it has been said that Champa had suffered from constant and continual Vietnamese southward aggression or Nam-tien since the latter's independence. In my view, it was only in the latter years of the fourteenth century that the balance of power between Vietnam and Champa was definitely lost. Before then, their relations had rather followed the "Southeast Asian" pattern in which the two polities or mandalas often struggled with each other for hegemony on one hand while maintaining close relations with each other on the other. Concerning the western neighbors, its relations with the Yunnanese polities were central concerns of the Vietnamese polity in the early centuries after independence as they shared similar cultural traits and a comparable level of Sinicization. Later, when the Thai-Lao group became powerful on its western borders, rivalry within the Vietnamese realm between those in the non-Sinicized mountainous areas with Thai cultural traits and those in the Sinicized delta region became evident. In the early centuries after independence, Vietnam was not yet to show its arrogance of claiming to be the "unique Sinicized country with the central status in the Southeast Asia" for claiming preeminence over its southern and western neighbors. In the fourteenth century, however, the Vietnamese began to see their polity as the "Southern Country" or "Middle Kingdom of Southeast Asia" which was entitled to reign over the surrounding barbarians. Later, in the fifteenth century when Vietnam had more or less realized such a dominant position, especially in its relations with Champa and Laos, the country definitely established its self-image as the "Southern Country."

2021-12-15 06:13:42
1 + 2 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA 李朝期(1010-1225)紅河デルタ開拓試論 : デルタ開拓における農学的適応の終末(<特集>故水野浩一教授を偲んで)

著者: 桜井由躬雄
出版者: 京都大学東南アジア研究センター
雑誌: 東南アジア研究 (ISSN:05638682)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.18, no.2, pp.271-314, 1980-09

この論文は国立情報学研究所の学術雑誌公開支援事業により電子化されました。

2021-12-15 06:13:42
1 + 1 Wikipedia

http://hdl.handle.net/2433/56016

1 0 0 0 OA 水道水中の極低濃度遊離塩素測定法とカルキ臭に由来する臭気強度推定法の開発

著者: 川口佳彦
出版者: 京都大学 (Kyoto University)
巻号頁・発行日: 2015-11-24

新制・課程博士

2021-12-14 23:04:00
1 + 2 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA 北海道十勝地方浦幌町でのウズラの確認記録

著者: 持田誠百瀬邦和
出版者: 浦幌町立博物館
雑誌: 浦幌町立博物館紀要
巻号頁・発行日: vol.20, pp.35-37, 2020-03

ウズラ Coturnix japonica はキジ科ウズラ属に分類される小型の草原性鳥類である。もともと伝統的な狩猟鳥だったが、明治中期から家禽としての飼養「養鶉」がはじまり、一般には鶏卵と並んで食用卵として広く知られている(奥山 2005)。しかし、野生のウズラは、全国的には1960年代から狩猟シーズンの捕獲羽数が減少傾向にあり、特に1980年代に激減した(木村 1991)。一方、北海道での最多捕獲年代は1960年代と、本州以南よりも遅かったが、やはり以後同じような減少傾向にあるとされる(奥山 2004)。筆者のうち百瀬は、2019年夏に、浦幌町の静内川沿いでウズラに遭遇した。浦幌での確認事例は近年きわめて少ないので、記録として報告する。

2021-12-14 15:57:44
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/77484

1 0 0 0 OA 感覚と報酬の予測誤差に基づく内部順モデルの適応 - 計算論的モデルと行動実験検証

著者: 佐藤仁是
巻号頁・発行日: 2016-03

Supervisor : 田中宏和

2021-12-14 12:40:09
1 + 4 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10119/13623

1 0 0 0 OA Borders in Flux : Ukraine as a Case Study of Russia's Approach to its Borders

著者: Menkiszak Marek
出版者: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, Hokkaido University
雑誌: Eurasia Border Review (ISSN:18849466)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.6, no.1, pp.83-102, 2015

This paper examines the contemporary border between Ukraine and Russia as a case study of Russia’s approach to its borders. Two research questions are addressed: Firstly, what does the annexation of Crimea by Russia as well as its attempts to further undermine Ukraine’s territorial integrity in its eastern region of Donbas say about Russia’s peculiar approach to Ukraine and its borders? Secondly Whether and To what extent does Russia’s approach represent a broader pattern of Russia’s policy towards its borders? This paper is divided into three parts: the first part gives a brief account of the modern history of the Russian-Ukrainian border; the second part focuses on peculiar Russian approaches to Ukraine revealed during the current Russian-Ukrainian crisis; the third part puts “the Ukrainian case” into broader conceptual frameworks. This paper concludes that Russia’s recognition of the territorial integrity and the borders of the post-Soviet states is conditional and depends mainly on their participation in Russia-led integration projects.

2021-12-14 07:14:25
1 + 0 Twitter

1 0 0 0 OA 〈考古学部会〉出土イネの形態・DNA分析からみた東北における稲作の普及

著者: 上條信彦田中克典
出版者: 弘前大学國史研究会
雑誌: 弘前大学國史研究 (ISSN:02874318)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.145, pp.64, 2018-10-30

2021-12-13 23:24:39
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10129/00007601

1 0 0 0 OA 特進の起源と變遷 : 列侯から光禄大夫へ

著者: 藤井律之
出版者: 東洋史研究會
雑誌: 東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.59, no.4, pp.607-644, 2001-03-31

The origins of the title Te jin, Lords Specially Advanced, a Tang-era civil service prestige title 文散官 are found in the Han. During the Han, Adjunct Marquises 列侯 resident in the capital were permitted to attend court twice a month (on the first and fifteenth day), and they were awarded the Te jin title, which was the equivalent of that of Counselor-in-chief 丞相, a court rank which was later of the same status to the Three Dukes 三公 in the military hierarchy. The criteria for this court rank were distinguished on the basis of official compensation, from duke 公, minister 卿, grand master 大夫, and serviceman 士 status, and this was at the same time the ritual order. However, with the addition of generals 將軍 to the hierarchy during the turmoil of the Late Han, this ritual order was disturbed. During the Wei, there was a pressing need to reorganize the ritual order and regulate the title of general. Although the earlier status hierarchy was revised to duke, solitaire 孤, minister, grand master, and servicemen, there was no fundamental reform of the system. The succeeding Jin inherited the status hierarchy of the Wei, but by shifting the criteria of status distinction from compensation accorded each office to the rank associated with each office, it was successful in reforming the ritual order. In addition, by establishing a fifth-rank within the nobility that was superior to that of Adjunct Marquis, the Te jin title lost its original function in relation to the Adjunct Marquises and instead became associated with civil officials 文官. Moreover, because the hierarchical order of the Guang lu da fu, Grand Master for Splendid Happiness, whom were paired with the generals became rigidly formalized, the role of the Te Jin title grew increasingly diluted. However, during the Southern Dynasties, the Te jin title played a new role. As can be understood from the fact that one individual who had refused the post of Commander Unequaled in Honor 開府儀同三司, the pinnacle of the hierarchy of the Guang lu da in, was given the title Te jin. The Te jin title was inserted within the hierarchy of the Guang lu da fu. This also marks the beginning of its being the highest rank of the Tang civil service prestige titles. The shift of association of the Te Jin title from Adjunct Marquises to the Guang lu da fu, and its ultimate retention among the civil service prestige titles was due to the fact the functions fulfilled by the Adjunct Marquises in the Han were split between the Generals and the Guang lu da fu during the Wei, Jin, and the period of the Northern and Southern Dynasties and that it conformed to the trends toward the adoption of Tang prestige titles.