著者
国枝 忠昭
出版者
The Institutew of Noise Control Engineering of Japan
雑誌
騒音制御 (ISSN:03868761)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.6, no.2, pp.59-63, 1982-04-01 (Released:2009-10-06)
参考文献数
3
被引用文献数
1
著者
千足 伸行
雑誌
美學美術史論集
巻号頁・発行日
vol.11, pp.114-71, 1997-07
著者
袖岡 幹子
出版者
千葉大学
巻号頁・発行日
1989

学位:千大院薬博乙第69号
出版者
出雲寺万次郎
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[5], 1854
著者
伊関 克彦
出版者
東京大学
巻号頁・発行日
1984

博士論文
著者
矢島 美寛
出版者
一般社団法人 日本数学会
雑誌
数学 (ISSN:0039470X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.46, no.4, pp.336-351, 1994-11-02 (Released:2008-12-25)
参考文献数
65
被引用文献数
2
著者
藤島 喜嗣 髙橋 幸子 江利川 滋 山田 一成
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.89.17219, (Released:2018-08-10)
参考文献数
11
被引用文献数
2

The Japanese version of the “Regret and Maximization Scale” (JRMS) can predict the individual difference in the style of decision-making. However, according to two previous studies that examined the reliability and validity of the JRMS, the reliability was not very high. In addition, the factor validity needs to be examined because the number of common factors the JRMS might consist of was ambiguous. The present study tested the factorial pattern of the JRMS using voluntary panel Web surveys. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis on 1,121 samples in Study 1 and a confirmatory factor analysis on 480 samples in Study 2. Both analyses showed that the JRMS consists of three factors: regret for one’s life, regret for purchase, and maximization. These results verified the factor validity of the JRMS. Each subscale showed an acceptable level of internal consistency. Each factor index positively correlated with each other, and also positively correlated with the age of participants. We discussed the reason why regret was divided into two categories, and the applicability of the JRMS to other studies.
著者
荒谷 春恵 山中 康光 大西 黎子 河野 静子 檜垣 雄三郎
出版者
公益社団法人 日本化学療法学会
雑誌
CHEMOTHERAPY (ISSN:00093165)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.15, no.5, pp.519-526, 1967 (Released:2010-09-24)
参考文献数
17

Pharmacological actions of 5-fluorouracil (Fu), an antipyrimidine agent, were investigated. In mice, LD50 were the doses of 730 ( sc), 1, 010 ( ip) and 41. 6 ( ic) mg/kg respectively. Chroni c convulsion, lateral turning or rotation of the whole body were observed in application of Fu in the brain of mice and its CD50 was the dose of 18. 15 mg/kg. For subacute toxicity, the rates of death w ere 50% during 30-40 days in the group of 20 mg/kg and 10∼50% during 50∼60 days in the group of 5∼10 mg/kg/day respectively. At that time decrease of testis weight and increase of spleen weight were noticed. The movement of the excised frog heart was accelerated at the dose of 0. 2 mg/ml of Fu, and inhibited at 2 mgiml. The mov e ment of the excised rabbit intestine was accelerated at the dose of 1 mcg/ml of Fu and inhibited at 0. 5 mg/ml. it has no effec t on the excised auricular vessels of the rabbit and dose of 1 mg/m1 of Fu increased the permeability of rabbit skin vessels. Temporary fall of blood pressu r e and decrease of respiration were observed at the dose of 10 mg/kg of Fu in the urethane-anesthetised rabbit. Bradycardia (lengthens of PQ inter val) took place at the dose of 4 mg/kg of Fu and tachycardia (shortens of ST interval) at the dose of 20 mg/kg. Local irritation of Fu was not observed. Fu, therefore, has not remarkab l e pharmacological actions at the therapeutic doses.
著者
日暮 雅夫 Masao Higurashi
雑誌
盛岡大学紀要 = The journal of Morioka University (ISSN:02860643)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, pp.49-62, 2005-03-31

This article tries to articulate what is embodied by the basic architecture of Habermas's discourse ethics. It goes on to analyze the ground concept and formulation of the discourse ethics that Habermas presents in the 'Chapter 3: Discourse Ethics' in his Moral Consciousness and Communicative Actions, elucidating the features of his formulation of the key concepts in discourse ethics. Habermas raises the point that J. Rawls, E. Tugendhat, K.-O. Apel and related philosophers are those heorists that adopt Kantian approach and have offered a unified interpretation of what they have attempted in his analyses of the conditions for evaluation that are based upon political impartiality and grounded on ascertained arguments. Habermas thinks of Apel's approach, i.e., his theory of discourse ethics as the most promising. This paper quotes several passages from Habermas's work that demonstrate that Habermas's approach has many affinities with Apel's discourse ethics. Their shared orientations are detectable in the fact that they both try to defend the cognitive approach to ethics against Worth Skepticisms and that they answer the questions of how moral order and norms can be founded. However, I would like to point out that gradually Habermas departs from Apel and clearly makes his own view of a discourse theory. He arrives at a conclusion to the effect that the term discourse ethics, itself is inadequate as the representation of his whole discourse theory.