出版者
京都大学哲学論叢刊行会
雑誌
哲学論叢 (ISSN:0914143X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, pp.129-141, 1990-07-01
著者
柏端 達也 美濃 正 篠原 成彦
出版者
慶應義塾大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2010

以下のことを遂行することにおいて課題に関するいくつかの成果を得た。すなわち、(1)色彩の存在論における投影説的見解に対する評価。(2)聴覚対象および嗅覚対象の存在論に対する、出来事意味論の観点からの、また共同知覚の観点からの検討。(3)いわゆる「共同注意」に関する体系的な哲学的概念分析。(4)知覚対象と知覚経験に関する可能世界的意味論に基づく理論化可能性の検討と評価。(5)知覚に関する表象説(志向説)のさまざまなヴァージョンに対する理論的評価。
著者
中村 隆文
出版者
THE JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2006, pp.229-242,258, 2007

Locke's theory as a contractarian has a great influence on the debates about social justice between "liberalism" and "libertarianism" yet. Even have many differences of opinions in those, they almost depend on the "natural law" and "natural right" elaborated by Locke when he tried to defend the "liberty" against an authority of the king. This reason is that they believe Locke's natural jurisprudence and ideas of "liberty" and "right" are set in the Declaration of Independence. It's nothing to be surprised at this, so now I intend not to doubt this fact, and that, not to convict their debates as pointless.<br> I suggest that "liberty", "right" and "justice" can be also defended philosophically by a school of thought in the eighteenth century other than Locke's, no matter how we estimate his influence on the then America. Directly and frankly professing, I regard the Scottish Enlightenment as functioning that role in the century, and its significance has still lived under the debate about the idea of social justice.<br> I place a special emphasis on the point that Scottish thinkers, especially David Hume and Adam Smith, had defended the America outside the theory of contractarianism involved with liberalism and Libertarianism. It shows that "justice" intrinsically exists in a relationship, in other words "convention" and it can not be discovered in the contractual lawmaking way but in the judiciary way reflecting sense of justice, or moral sense, because law of justice will be expanding over the domain of human rationality of economical worldview.
著者
土井 真一
出版者
THE JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2005, pp.30-41,199, 2006

In this article, the difference between the <i>Recthsstaat</i> principle and rule of law is clarified through analyses of the administrative and judicial law-making processes. Based on such analyses, pros and cons of the <i>Rechtsstaat</i> and rule of law are compared, and the conclusion is drawn that a way to unite the two law-making processes to work together in a balanced manner should be sought, and that reinforcement of the judicial law-making process is indispensable for rooting the rule of law in the Japanese society.