著者
林 成多
出版者
The Association for the Geological Collaboration in Japan
雑誌
地球科学 (ISSN:03666611)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.51, no.5, pp.361-370, 1997-09-25 (Released:2017-07-11)

埼玉県入間市野田の入間川河床において,仏子層のA部層より多くのネクイハムシ亜科の化石が得られた.これらの化石を検討した結果,ほとんどの化石はミズクサハムシ属の1種に同定された.この種は,前胸背板の表面を網目状の微細彫刻が覆い,不明瞭な中央縦溝を持つなどの特徴により,ミズクサハムシ属の現生種とは区別され,絶滅した未記載種である.本論では,仏子層A部層産のミズクサハムシ属の1種を新種Plateumaris dorsata, sp. nov.ブシミズクサハムシ(新称)として記載し,本種のミズクサハムシ属における分類学的な位置づけについて考察した.
著者
若林 実 南 宏一 西村 泰志
出版者
京都大学防災研究所
雑誌
京都大学防災研究所年報 (ISSN:0386412X)
巻号頁・発行日
no.24, pp.p225-243, 1981-04

An experimental study is made to know the effect of working axial compression on the reductionof load carrying capacity of interior beam-to-column connection in steel reinforced concrete frames.Experimental variable is the ratio of applied axial compression to the ultimate compressive strength.Main discussion is concentrated on the shear strength, failure mechanism, strain history of webpanel and flange portion and hysteretic characteristics involved in the large deformation range undermonotonic and repeated loading. It is concluded that the load carrying capacity of beam-to-columnconnection that is supposed to fail in shear is hardly affected by magnitude of axial compressionon column
著者
持木 幸一 小林 久夫
出版者
日本アイソトープ協会
雑誌
Radioisotopes (ISSN:00338303)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.57, no.2, pp.153-165, 2008-02-15
参考文献数
35
被引用文献数
2
著者
林 敏
出版者
日本印度学仏教学会
雑誌
印度學佛教學研究
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.2, pp.955-949, 2017

<p>Zhisheng 智昇 is well-known for his seminal contribution to Buddhist catalogues. His scholarly output includes not only the famous <i>Kaiyuan shijiao lu</i> 開元釈教録 but also the <i>Xu datang neidian lu</i> 続大唐内典録, the <i>Xu gujin yijing tuji</i> 続古今訳経図紀, the <i>Xu ji gujin fodao lunheng</i> 続集古今仏道論衡, and the <i>Ji zhujing lichan yi</i> 集諸経礼懺儀. These five catalogues amount to a total of 25 scrolls (巻). The <i>Kaiyuan shijiao lu</i>, compiled in year 18 of the Kaiyuan 開元 era, i.e., 730 CE, is widely regarded as a representative opus of the genre. It has had a far-reaching influence on the history of Buddhist bibliography all across East Asia.</p><p>Zhisheng's work has not been immune, however, to criticism. His reliability has been questioned, for instance, on account of inconsistencies such as the contradictory notations concerning the <i>Shoulengyan jing</i> 首楞厳経. To be more precise, the testimony of the <i>Kaiyuan shijiao lu</i> on the text is different from that of the <i>Xu gujin yijing tuji</i>. Recent research suggests, however, that such inconsistencies cannot be attributed to Zhisheng himself. The old Japanese manuscript versions of these two catalogues, which are among their earliest textual witnesses, do not contain any of the inconsistencies on the <i>Shoulengyan jing</i> which appear in the later recensions. We can hence safely assume that the so-called "inconsistencies" are later scribal corruptions which resulted in the process of textual transmission. </p><p>My investigation yields, therefore, the following conclusions: </p><p>1. The so-called inconsistencies between the <i>Kaiyuan shijiao lu</i> and the <i>Xu gujin yijing tuji</i> derive from their textual transmission.</p><p>2. By the same token, the different accounts concerning the <i>Shoulengyan jing</i> which appear in various catalogues do not constitute proof that the text is apocryphal.</p><p>3. The criticism of Zhisheng is unjustified. We can confidently re-assess Zhisheng's reliability as a serious and cautious compiler of Buddhist catalogues.</p>