著者
馬部 隆弘
出版者
吉川弘文館
雑誌
日本歴史 (ISSN:03869164)
巻号頁・発行日
no.792, pp.85-93, 2014-05
著者
加地 宏江 Hiroe Kaji
雑誌
人文論究 (ISSN:02866773)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.37, no.1, pp.49-99, 1987-07-25 (Released:2016-12-01)

1 0 0 0 OA 工夫之錦

著者
船山喜一輔之 著
出版者
[出版者不明]
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[2], 1900
著者
西川 哲治
出版者
一般社団法人 日本物理学会
雑誌
日本物理学会誌 (ISSN:00290181)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.14, no.6, pp.306-316, 1959-06-05 (Released:2008-04-14)
参考文献数
40
著者
大村 いづみ
出版者
産業学会
雑誌
産業学会研究年報 (ISSN:09187162)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1999, no.14, pp.75-86,107, 1999-03-30 (Released:2009-10-08)
参考文献数
28

The main industries in the Hamamatsu-area are the textile industry, the musical instrument manufacturing industry and the motorcycle manufacturing industry. Recently, due to intensification of the international competition and the structural change of the social circumstances, the industries in this area are pressed to change their economic system and management style. In fact, the sluggishness of the textile and the musical instrument manufacturing industry has become a serious problem to this area. The musical instrument manufacturing industry is a representative industry of the Hamamatsu-area. As the subject of our research we took up the piano manufacturing industry and tried to make clear why the piano manufacturers have gathered in the Hamamatsu-area and what difficulties they face at the turning point of the Japanese economy. We also touched future perspective and problem on this industry.The results of our study are summed up as follows.(1) The piano manufacturing industry came into existence, based on the local, historical accumulation of skill, as other local industries.(2) The accidental factors as the success of domestic production of the organ by T. Yamaha, had a big effect on the development of this industry.(3) The competition between enterprises in the area hastened the growth of this industry.(4) Now at the end of the 20th century this industry approaches the turning point, facing stagnant demand and international competition.
著者
佐藤 郡衛
出版者
一般社団法人日本教育学会
雑誌
教育学研究 (ISSN:03873161)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.74, no.2, pp.215-225, 2007-06
被引用文献数
1

本稿の目的は、国際理解教育論と実践の関連の分析を通してそこに内在する問題を明らかにし、今後の実践を進めるための基本的視点を提示することである。国際教育理解の問題として第1に理論と実践に乖離があることを指摘できる。第2に多様な理論が教育現場に入り込んだ結果、海外・帰国児童生徒、外国人児童生徒といった対象別の実践、異文化理解・環境・平和といった領域別の実践、さらにコミュニケーション力、表現力といった資質に注目した実践が混在するという問題を抱えている。第3は実践では個人的資質の育成のみを強調してきたという問題がある。課題として、多様な実践を一定の枠組みで整理し、しかも実践の視点を明確にしていくこと、個人的資質を育成するカリキュラム論や学習論を明確にすることを指摘した。今後、国際理解教育は、多元的アイデンティティの形成、批判的思考力、相互的な知、参与的な知の育成を目指す必要があることを示した。
著者
加藤 麻樹 下平 佳江
雑誌
長野県短期大学紀要 = Journal of Nagano Prefectural College
巻号頁・発行日
vol.61, pp.99-108, 2006-12-27

Many of elderly people are not good at operation of PC with mouse and keyboard, because they need more time to experience to get enough skill. Through the observation to them in PC school, their characteristics are different from the younger people's movements. In this study, the difference of mouse operation between elderly people and younger people became clear by measurement of mouse movement. Mouse rotation in the horizontal pointing operation can make some difference among them. The volume of acceleration to the target would be the cause of the difference. From the result, we can find out the needs for development of mouse movement system which consider the elderly people's operation characteristics.
著者
韓 貞淑 崔 在東
出版者
ロシア史研究会
雑誌
ロシア史研究 (ISSN:03869229)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.75, pp.3-20, 2004

<p>The wave of Leontev renaissance in Russia since Perestroika is a very interesting phenomena. Some scholars look up to Leontev as a prophet and foreseer who showed with keen insight the "Russian way" for his descendants lost in the whirlpool of epochal system change. This article rejects such an estimation of Leontev, but tries to analyze his view on cultural pluralism and the idea of cultural uniqueness of Russia. Leontev's thought of cultural pluralism was closely related with his characteristic aesthetricism He defined beauty as "diversity in unity." What matters for beauty is not the inner idea but the outer diversity and variety. In order to be beautiful, any being should contain different and unequal components. Leontev disliked most of all an aggregate of standardized and equal things. A culture should include different and unequal things; and the world should consist of different shapes of culture. In his discourse on the cycle of cultural development which foreruns Spengler's thought on stages (birth, growth, illness and death) of culture. Leontev insisted that a culture passes through three stages of development: In the first stage things are not differentiated and all the same; in the second and developed stage things become differentiated and unequal; the third stage is that of second simplification when all things show the same and standardized shapes again as when things are decaying and dying. Leontev identified equality with sameness and standardization. Thus a society where the principles of equality and democracy rule was in his view in the state of degeneration and decay. Traditional societies with non-egalitarian estate system were much healthier and more beautiful than an egalitarian democratic society. With its equalized mediocre petit-bourgeois style of life and gray industrial cities Western Europe was just in such a state, whereas Russia was keeping the traditional estate system including serfdom and presented a more beautiful type of society with colorful and various shapes of human life. In order to keep the beauty of Russian culture Leontev rejected democratization and reforms of Russian society and wanted to "freeze the society" so that his country could maintain autocracy and the estate system. Leontev thus insisted most stubbornly the necessity to preserve the cultural originality and uniqueness of a society. He contrasted the Russian culture to that of Western Europe in behalf of the former. In this sense he stood near to Muscovite Slavophiles of the 1840s and Pan-Slavists like Danilevsky. For Leontev however the blood tie of the Slavic peoples was not important. What mattered was a cultural tie. According to him the Russian culture was built on Byzantinism characterized by 1) autocracy, 2) Orthodoxy and 3) renunciation of secular utopianism. Thus Leontev had a special feeling of solidarity for the Orthodox Christians and emphasized the importance of the unity of all Orthodox. Hence his negative reaction to the Bulgarian Orthodox Church which strived for and gained independence from the Constantinople Patriarchate ( Greek Church). He saw in it the religious disunity of Orthodox Christians. In this context he wished that Russia would seize and own Constantinople (Istanbul). According to Leontev it would mean "the unity of political Russia and ecclesiastical Greece." This would enable the church unity of all Orthodox and the victory of the Eastern Church over the Western. This was for him the historical mission of Russia. Though he disliked political nationalism on the ground that it was a form of egalitarianism and liberalism, his wish for seize of Constantinople made no difference from the political nationalism of Pan-Slavism type. Thus a champion of the cultural independence of Russia became-though only in a limited sense-an advocate of aggressive expansionism. It was nonetheless beyond doubt</p><p>(View PDF for the rest of the abstract.)</p>

1 0 0 0 OA 裁判記録

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[42],