著者
田邊 玲子 トラウデン ディーター クラヴィッター アルネ
出版者
京都大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2010-04-01

この間「身体」が頻繁に議論されてきたが、非身体的なものの側面、とりわけ身体的なものと非身体的なものが交錯する領域が見逃されてきた。本研究は、ドイツ文学における身体と非身体との関連を研究した。キリスト教神学における身体と魂との関連、古代から現代の西欧哲学における模倣と身体存在についての言説、18世紀のヴィンケルマン、ヴィーラント、ゲーテ、そしてシルエットと影絵芝居の流行の美的内包について検討し、さらに、声、とくに1920年代の現代オペラにおける非主体化について考察した。本研究の成果は、身体的なものの不在といった、現代文化の特徴的な状況の解析に寄与するだろう。
著者
滝沢 文雄
出版者
日本体育・スポーツ哲学会
雑誌
体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, no.2, pp.17-25, 2002 (Released:2010-04-30)
参考文献数
26
被引用文献数
2 2

The purpose of this study is to show the new domain of a human body culture which physical education should take on. The culture has seldom or never been conscious in physical education up to the present. This study focuses on everyday behavior. Though the research method taken in the study is based upon the related texts, this paper employs a phenomenological consideration focusing on practice.The author, first of all, examines how the body is thought today, which leads to the consideration about the body that makes the body culture as well as re-examination of the views on the body. And then behavioral action is examined. The difference of behavioral action from such as upbringing and military training is touched on during the process. The refined behavioral action is discussed in relation to the body that makes communication possible. Finally it is concluded that physical education should take on the new domain of the human body culture besides what it covers now.Physical education has hardly ever been conscious about the domain of the body culture called behavioral action up until now. The domain contains the field of habitus and these behaviors have been mastered in day-to-day life. This includes a phase of discipline on behavior in society. The way of action required in society is collapsing rapidly in today's life, and behavior of children has been falling into disorder. The teachers therefore have to educate them behavior that is required in the present society while re-asking the old culture of upbringing and training. It implies the changes of the objectives and correcting the contents of the subject. This also implies the education of communication capability for living in society. A form of behavior consists of accumulation of the promising thing to exchange with others in each situation, and it is not the skill completed individually but the skill of cooperation with others; then it can be called a body capacity which deals with relationship to others.It is therefore necessary that physical educators are aware of a domain of the body culture, being aware of selecting the contents carefully, and have to educate them intentionally. The time allocation has to be provided in a lesson in order for children to master the culture, and it must be guaranteed that they can acquire it steadily.
著者
西村 正秀
出版者
京都大学哲学論叢刊行会
雑誌
哲学論叢 (ISSN:0914143X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.39, pp.46-62, 2012
著者
大竹 晋
出版者
筑波大学哲学・思想学会
雑誌
哲学・思想論叢 (ISSN:02873702)
巻号頁・発行日
no.21, pp.67-80, 2003-01-31

小稿は先に発表した二つの菩提留支研究、拙稿A「菩提留支の失われた三著作」(『東方学』102)拙稿B「『金剛仙論』の成立問題」(「仏教史学研究」44,1)および、それを踏まえた『大乗起信論』研究、拙稿C「[?][?]行派文献と『大乗起信論』」 ...
著者
金 京南
出版者
東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室
雑誌
インド哲学仏教学研究 (ISSN:09197907)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.10, pp.61-75, 2003-03-20

In this paper, I examine how the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra 入法界品, the last chapter of the Hua-yen ching 華厳経, was interpreted in the Chinese Hua-yen school, specifically clarifying the differences between the interpretations of Chih-yen 智儼(602-668) and his disciple Fa-tsang 法蔵(643-712). Paying attention especially to their theories regarding the "division" of the sutra into smaller sections, I examine both their interpretations from two angles: 1) interpreting the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra within the Hua-yen ching, and 2) interpreting the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra by itself. Chih-yen advances a theory of three divisions in his Sou-hsuan chi 捜玄記, and therein he suggests two views on the liu-t'ung-fen 流通分. 1) The Hua-yen ching originally consisted of one hundred thousand gathas, of which only thirty-six thousand gathas now remain, and the liu-t'ung-fen is missing. This means that the liu-t'ung-fen never existed. 2) In the sutra, the last two gathas are considered to correspond to the liu-t'ung-fen. The first view is based on the assumption that the sutra consists of one hundred thousand gathas, excluding the liu-t'ung-fen, and the second, that the sutra consists of thirty-six thousand gathas which include the liu-t'ung-fen. This means that, in Chih-yen's three divisions, the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra either belongs to the cheng-tsung-fen 正宗分, or includes both the cheng-tsung-fen and the liu-t'ung-fen. Chih-yen, influenced by Chih-cheng 智正(559-639), also divided the cheng-tsung-fen into four parts, the last of which is the i-yuan hsiu-hsing cheng-te fen 依縁修行成徳分. To this belong the "Li-shih-chien p'in" 離世間品 and the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra. The latter is also called the i-jen ju-cheng fen 依人入証文. For Chih-yen, the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra represented a Buddhist teaching of realization (cheng 証) which perfects ascetic training through shan-chih-shih 善知識. This was the very chapter from which began the enlightenment of sentient beings. Fa-tsang's three divisions developed from his Wen-i kang-mu 文義網目, which does not admit the liu-t'ung-fen, to the T'an-hsuan chi 探玄記. In the meantime, he bolstered his arguments with the concept of dharmadhātu (fa-chieh 法界) and, furthermore, emphasized the One Vehicle character of the Hua-yen ching, taking the Three Vehicle character as the liu-t'ung-fen. In addition, basing himself on Chih-yen's four divisions, he suggested a theory of five divisions. He views the structure of the Hua-yen ching as being fully provided with hsin 信 (faith), chieh 解 (understanding), hsing 行 (practice), and cheng 証 (realization). The Gaņdavyūha-sūtra comes under the Buddhist teaching of cheng-ju 証入. Chih-yen put emphasis on the importance of shan-chih-shih in dividing the inner structure of the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra. He categorizes all shan-chih-shih into five types. This method of categorizing was taken over by Fa-tsang. The main characteristic of Fa-tsang's method of dividing the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra lies in his distinguishing of the essential assembly (pen-hui 本会) from the secondary assembly (mo-hui 末会). To sum up, the main difference between the two theories can be reduced to the way in which emphasis is put either on the concept of shan-chih-shih or on that of dharmadhātu. Chih-yen emphasized the former, Fa-tsang the latter. This difference shows the development of understanding the Gaņdavyūha-sūtra, from Chih-yen's practical interpretation to Fa-tsang's rather theoretical one.
著者
一郷 正道 小澤 千晶 太田 蕗子 上野 牧生
出版者
京都光華女子大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2008

後期インド仏教の論師カマラシーラによる『修習次第』の翻訳研究を行い,付録に,瞑想の方法を述べる箇所のテキスト対照表,引用文献一覧,シノプシス等を加え冊子にまとめた.本書が提示する実践方法が「唯識観行」に基づくことを,先行する唯識文献の対応箇所をあげることで具体的に提示した.また引用文献一覧では,他の文献で同一文献の同一文言を引用するケースを精力的に収集し提示した.これらは,仏教における「哲学」と「行」の伝承の系譜を明らかにする基礎資料を提供するものともなる.
著者
國分 功一郎
出版者
岩波書店
雑誌
思想 (ISSN:03862755)
巻号頁・発行日
no.1051, pp.7-28, 2011-11
著者
中川 久嗣
出版者
日本哲学会
雑誌
哲学 (ISSN:03873358)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1998, no.49, pp.271-279, 1998-05-01 (Released:2009-07-23)

ミシェル・フーコーの思想を前期と後期に分けるよく知られたやり方に従うならば、『知の考古学』 (L'archéologie dusavoir, 1969) は、前期最後の著作として位置づけられ、一般には知のシステム性へと向けられた彼の前期の思想内容を方法論的レヴェルで総括したものと言われている。そこでのフーコーの主要な眼目は、言表や言説の特殊な規則性とその自律的性格を明確化し、それに基づいて知の特殊な布置の構造を、実定性やアルシーヴや歴史的先験性といった諸概念を用いて分析する、いわゆる考古学的方法論の理論化を行うことであった。ところでドレィファスとラビノーの研究 (以下、D/Rと略記) は、フーコーの前期の考古学を、あまりにも自律的な言説の構造に捕らわれ過ぎた点で方法論的失敗であるとし、フーコーがそれを放棄して権力分析を目指す後期の「系譜学」へ移行したことをより高く評価する。実際フーコー自身、考古学にかわって系譜学を自らの方法として全面に打ち出すようになるであろう。しかし前期フーコーの思想と言われるものは、D/Rの言うように、本当に失敗であり、つまりは意味のないものなのであろうか。本稿ではこのような視点から、構造主義に最も強く影響されていたとされるこの時期の著作『知の考古学』における「言表/言説」と「実定性」の概念を取り上げ、そのうちに、後期の権力論へと続いてゆく基本的な考え方と可能性が存していることを明らかにしようとするものである。