著者
上原 俊介 中川 知宏 田村 達
出版者
日本グループ・ダイナミックス学会
雑誌
実験社会心理学研究 (ISSN:03877973)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.54, no.2, pp.89-100, 2015 (Released:2015-03-26)
参考文献数
38
被引用文献数
1 1

義憤(moral outrage)とは,ある出来事やそれに関与した人物の行動が道義に反しているという知覚によって引き起こされる怒りのことを指す。怒りの研究者たちはこれまで,道徳違反を目の当たりにしたときには義憤が喚起されると仮定してきた。ところが最近の研究によれば(たとえば,Batson, Chao, & Givens, 2009),怒りの喚起は自分(あるいは自分の同胞)が危害を加えられたときにしか確認されず,私憤(personal anger)が怒りの本質であると指摘する者もいる。そこで本研究は,公正に対する敏感さ(justice sensitivity)という人格特性に注目し,義憤とは正しさに過敏に反応する人たちにみられる制限的な感情反応ではないかと予測した。日本人参加者に対して架空の拉致事件に関する新聞記事を読ませ,そのとき感じた怒りの強さを答えさせた。その結果,どんなに公正に敏感な参加者でも,強い怒りは日本人が拉致被害の犠牲になったときにしか報告されず,私憤説に一致する証拠しか確認されなかった。こうした知見を踏まえ,本研究は,私憤がきわめて堅固な反応であるという可能性を指摘した。
著者
田村 達 大渕 憲一
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, no.2, pp.165-171, 2006

Assuming that labels describing a victim as a dehumanized entity reduce a harm-doer's control over aggressive behavior, we attempted to examine the effects of such labels on levels of aggression. A one-on-one fighting video game was used in order to conduct this experiment. During the game, 63 male undergraduates exhibited uncomfortable noises to an opponent who was given either a dehumanizing or anonymous label. We predicted that the dehumanizing label would decrease empathetic concern for, and increase both perceptual and outward hostility towards the opponent (this was measured by high levels of noises during matches). To examine the question of whether the dehumanizing label actually lessens aggressive behavior, or in fact motivates aggressive behavior, we compared the effects of the label on levels of aggression observing whether the opponent showed hostile behavior or not. The results partially-supported our hypothesis. Although the dehumanizing label did not directly increase aggression, further analysis showed that it indirectly increased aggression by lowering empathetic concern for the opponent. Similarly, our results suggested the possibility that dehumanizing labels may in fact increase aggressive behavior in people.
著者
上原 俊介 中川 知宏 国佐 勇輔 岩淵 絵里 田村 達 森 丈弓
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, no.3, pp.158-168, 2013

Anger at the violation of a moral standard has been called moral outrage. However, recent research found that only when the victim of a moral violation was oneself (or a member of one's group) did it evoke strong anger. This suggests that the violation of a moral standard itself does not elicit anger, and such anger may be evidence of personal anger evoked by harm to oneself (or a member of one's group). In our study, we assume that moral outrage may be evoked when the likelihood of restoring fairness (e.g., compensation) is expected. We conducted three experiments in which Japanese university students read a newspaper report (fictitious) depicting an abduction case. For half of the participants, the abducted victim was Japanese; for the other half, Slovenian. After reading the news story, they were asked to report the intensity of the feelings of anger and whether the abduction was morally wrong. We found that the report evoked considerable anger only when the abducted victim was Japanese, regardless of whether restoring fairness was actually expected. This indicated that the reported anger provided evidence only of personal anger, not of moral outrage; thus, the likelihood of restoring fairness is not a determinant of moral outrage. These findings imply that personal anger, rather than moral outrage, is more prevalent in social life.
著者
上原 俊介 中川 知宏 国佐 勇輔 岩淵 絵里 田村 達 森 丈弓
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, no.3, pp.158-168, 2013-03-31 (Released:2017-03-03)

Anger at the violation of a moral standard has been called moral outrage. However, recent research found that only when the victim of a moral violation was oneself (or a member of one's group) did it evoke strong anger. This suggests that the violation of a moral standard itself does not elicit anger, and such anger may be evidence of personal anger evoked by harm to oneself (or a member of one's group). In our study, we assume that moral outrage may be evoked when the likelihood of restoring fairness (e.g., compensation) is expected. We conducted three experiments in which Japanese university students read a newspaper report (fictitious) depicting an abduction case. For half of the participants, the abducted victim was Japanese; for the other half, Slovenian. After reading the news story, they were asked to report the intensity of the feelings of anger and whether the abduction was morally wrong. We found that the report evoked considerable anger only when the abducted victim was Japanese, regardless of whether restoring fairness was actually expected. This indicated that the reported anger provided evidence only of personal anger, not of moral outrage; thus, the likelihood of restoring fairness is not a determinant of moral outrage. These findings imply that personal anger, rather than moral outrage, is more prevalent in social life.
著者
田窪 米治 竹田 守 田村 達彦 岩井 宏 高原 博司 小森 一徳 別所 芳宏 山下 一郎 宇喜多 謙二
出版者
一般社団法人映像情報メディア学会
雑誌
テレビジョン学会誌 (ISSN:03866831)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.44, no.5, pp.544-549, 1990-05-20
被引用文献数
1

ハイビジョン用液晶投写型テレビに応用できる高密度TFTアレイを開発した.高密度で高開口率を実現するために反射型構造を提案した.また, 対角約2,3インチの基板内に約136万画素を集積したTFTアレイを試作し, 画素ピッチ30(μm)×35(μm)で70%の開口率を実現した.同時に, 高密度化に伴って問題となるTFTアレイの寄生容量の画像への影響を抑えるために, TFTアレイ構成と駆動方法を組合わせた新方式を開発した.そして, 今回試作したTFTアレイを用いた液晶投写型テレビの画像評価により, その効果を明らかにした.
著者
田村 達 大渕 憲一
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, no.2, pp.165-171, 2006-11-30 (Released:2017-02-08)
被引用文献数
1

Assuming that labels describing a victim as a dehumanized entity reduce a harm-doer's control over aggressive behavior, we attempted to examine the effects of such labels on levels of aggression. A one-on-one fighting video game was used in order to conduct this experiment. During the game, 63 male undergraduates exhibited uncomfortable noises to an opponent who was given either a dehumanizing or anonymous label. We predicted that the dehumanizing label would decrease empathetic concern for, and increase both perceptual and outward hostility towards the opponent (this was measured by high levels of noises during matches). To examine the question of whether the dehumanizing label actually lessens aggressive behavior, or in fact motivates aggressive behavior, we compared the effects of the label on levels of aggression observing whether the opponent showed hostile behavior or not. The results partially-supported our hypothesis. Although the dehumanizing label did not directly increase aggression, further analysis showed that it indirectly increased aggression by lowering empathetic concern for the opponent. Similarly, our results suggested the possibility that dehumanizing labels may in fact increase aggressive behavior in people.