1 0 0 0 消えた馬

著者
宮下正美著
出版者
東都書房
巻号頁・発行日
1959
著者
塚本 靖
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
建築雑誌 (ISSN:00038555)
巻号頁・発行日
no.94, pp.279-289, 1894-10
著者
大島 延次郎
出版者
社会経済史学会
雑誌
社会経済史学 (ISSN:00380113)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.13, no.2, pp.135-139, 1943

1 0 0 0 IR 古代蝦夷論

著者
松本 芳夫
出版者
三田史学会
雑誌
史学 (ISSN:03869334)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, no.3, pp.1(281)-58(338), 1943-06
著者
渡辺 達三
出版者
社団法人日本造園学会
雑誌
造園雑誌 (ISSN:03877248)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.36, no.3, pp.27-33, 1972

This is a study of the open spaces in which peasants' aprising are rasied in the feudal age of <I><B>Edo</B></I> in order to know the character of some open spaces as <I><B>Square</B></I> (the first report).<BR>In chapter 1, it is pointed out that the peasants' uprising in the feudal age of Edo is firmly based on the <I><B>Agrargemeinde</B></I>, and therefore, the places in and by which the members ofthe <I><B>Agrargemein wesen</B></I> are able to concentrate physically and Spiritually will be needed.<BR>Some such places corresponding to the introduction to the finale of peasants' uprising, are studied in chapter 2.
著者
田島 佳也
出版者
社会経済史学会
雑誌
社会経済史学 (ISSN:00380113)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.46, no.3, pp.293-321,374-37, 1980

The purpose of this article is to survey the management of basho (fishing territories) by Eiyemon Sato who was a contractor for the fishery at Utasutu and Isoya basho in the late Edo period after 1853, and to bring to light the way the fishermen worked for the contractor positively through various books concerning their management. Approaches will be made to the Sotos as a center, to those fishermen employed by the Satos, and to hamaju fishermen including ni-hachi fishermen, who paid twenty percent of his catch to the contractor. Following is the outline of this article. Since basho were bases of fishery devoid of reproducing conditions, the Satos, beside pursuing fishing mainly of herring themselves, catch of which was diminishing, laid daily necessaries and means of production in stock and sold them. Judging from this operation, the fishermen directly employed by the Satos and hamaju fishermen were essential to the Satos' management of basho. Among the fishermen directly employod there were two categories: one, called bannin (watchman or foreman), was employed by the year and the other, called yatoinin (employee), by the season. Though most of them came from Shimokita district alike, the former was to a greater extent personally subordinate in master-and-servant relationship, while the latter actually had characteristics somewhat similar to those of a wage labourer. On the other hand, hamaju fishermen included permanent residents and those who were temporarily working away from home, both of whom came mostly from Matsumae district. In the late Edo period there appeared those who, together with their wife and children, emigrated and worked away from home. Some of them, having started as small fishermen, were successful enough to cope with the contractor, and with their developing productivity they grew to be main members of the economy at basho. In keeping with this change, the Satos shifted the Center of their management from fishery to providing people with daily necessaries and means of production. In conclusion the Satos manoeuvred to control the labour through tension among the fishermen which was caused by the difference in their geographical origins. They employed the fishermen whose home villages were different from those of hamaju fishermen, intending to exclude the fishermen's mutual bond caused by local connection. The Satos strengthened managerial role of bannin and shifted the center of their activities on hamaju fishermen who had been getting independent from the contractor. The nature of the existence of those hamaju fishermen can be explained first by the glowth of reproducing conditions at basho, and secondly by the support of the shogunate that governed Ezo district and sought measures of distribution fitting for fishery.
著者
兵藤 裕己
出版者
日本文学協会
雑誌
日本文学 (ISSN:03869903)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.38, no.2, pp.28-39, 1989

近世の職人仲間でむすばれた講のひとつに、太子講がある。おもに大工・左官などの建築関係の職人によっておこなわれるが、それは、中世の各種職人、「道々の者」たちに担われた聖徳太子信仰のなごりといえるものである。その具体的な原型は、中世の修験・山伏の徒に率いられたタイシの徒にあるだろうか。また、律僧の太子堂に結縁した各種職人や賎民、あるいは、聖徳太子像をまつる一向宗寺内に結集した手工業者や行商人たちも、中世における太子講衆の原像である。たとえば、近世の木地屋が、木地職プロパーにおいて管理・統制される背景には、社会的分業を身分として固定化させる幕府の支配政策があったろう。諸国木地屋のあいだに、小椋谷の『惟喬親王縁起』が(太子信仰を駆逐するかたちで)流布した過程とは、要するに、中世的な「諸職諸道」が分断・解体される過程であり、それは、近世権力による一向宗寺内-そのイデオロギー的中核となった太子講衆-の解体という政治史的事件とも表裏する問題であった。
著者
田崎 公司
出版者
公益財団法人 史学会
雑誌
史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.103, no.2, pp.188-216,315-31, 1994

<p>In this paper the author first discusses the scheme set up by SASAKI Junnosuke for explaining in concrete terms from the standpoint of early modern history the period of change in Japan spanning the last years of the Tokugawa shogunate and the early years of Meiji. While lauding SASAKI's scheme called "a social revival situation" (yonaoshi jokyo 世直し状況), the author points to its limitations in depicting an historical image of peasants movements from the end of Tokugawa all the way through to the free peoples rights (jiyu-minken 自由民権) movement. Occupying a particularly important place in Sasaki's social revival situation scheme is the Yah-Yah Uprising that occurred following the break up of Aizu-han as a result of its defeat in the Boshin Civil War of 1868. Also, Sasaki's concept of yonaoshi draws heavily on the research of SHOJI Kichinosuke carried out 37 years ago. However, the Yah-Yah Uprising is indeed an excellent starting point for studying peasant movements during the period, because it occurred in the same region (western Fukushima Prefecture) that produced the free peoples rights movement-related Fukushima (Kitakata) Incident of 1882. The task of the present paper is to reconsider Shoji's work in the light of newly discovered source materials and show the errors inherent to Sasaki's "yonaoshi" scheme. These newly discovered source materials collected throughout the Aizu region produce a very different contour of the Yah-Yah Uprising in 1)broadening the geographic location of the uprising that Sasaki has termed the "Aizu five-county civil disturbances" (to actually six counties) and 2)clarifying the number of participants, their social class and the amount of damages wrought in the uprising. As a result of his reconsideration of the Yah-Yah Uprising, the author comes to the following conclusions. First, the evidence makes clear that the uprising developed out of the four northern counties (gun 郡) of Kita-Aizu, Yama, Kawanuma and Ohnuma rather than the southern county of Minami-Aizu as formerly believed. Secondly, the Yah-Yah Uprising, while exhibiting the same contradictions characterized by the later Fukushima Incident, was inevitably an anti-authoritarian action, because it was set off by external factors caused by the Boshin War, but it soon developed into a situation that surpassed the original intent of the peasants, forcing the Meiji government to begin searching immediately for a new regional governance policy. Thirdly, Sasaki's over-emphasis on the significance of the Bureau of Civil Affairs (Minsei-Kyoku 民政局) as the end to the "first stage" of the uprising should be reconsidered in light of the proven relationship of the action taken by local peasants following the outbreak of the uprising to the establishment of the Bureau and an outlook that views the transition to modernity from the more dynamic aspect of clashes between the Meiji government's regional governance policies and local residents. In relation to this final point, through the process of rebuilding the local community political organization (so 惣) within the Uprising, localites where former community leaders were restored to positions of authority…specifically, the development process from former headman to policeman to new village headman among the leaders in the four central counties of the Uprising…attained an important link to their involvement in the free peoples rights movement of the following decades. The author's investigation of the community of Nozawa in Kawanuma County is a classic example of what he terms "the return to the Tokugawa-style local leadership". Finally, the author emphasizes the need to grasp the transition from early modern to modern society in Japan as a process of local socio-economic reform lasting from the Restoration through the people's rights movement era…a process that</p><p>(View PDF for the rest of the abstract.)</p>