著者

淺野 裕一

出版者

東洋史研究會

雑誌

東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.2, pp.353-362, 1988-09-30

著者

中村 廣治郎

出版者

東京大学東洋文化研究所

雑誌

東洋文化研究所紀要 (ISSN:05638092)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, pp.1-110, 1975-03

---

Abu Hamid al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) being one of the greatest Muslim thinkers comparable to St. Augustine or Thomas Aquinas in the Christian tradition, there is no wonder that so much attention has been paid to him and so many studies have been done on him by both Muslim and non-Muslim scholars. Even in Christendom, the study of al-Ghazālī (Algazel), or interest in his works at the least, goes far back to the Middle Ages when the Christian world was busy with transplanting the Greek philosophy through the Arabic translations. Al-Ghazālī's Maqāsid al-Falāsifah, his compendium of philosophy (falsqfdh) was first put into Latin toward the end of the 12th century, and he was mainly known in Europe throughout the Middle Ages as the author of this work, and therefore supposed by mistake to be a“philosopher”(failasūf) himself. This misunderstanding is ascribed to the unfortunate fact that his“preface”to this Maqāsid dropped from its most Latin manuscripts for some so far unknown reasons during their circulation, so that it was little known that the compendium was but a preliminary step to his refutation of philosophy (in his later work, Tahāfut al-Falāsifah). This Tahāfut was also introduced to Europe in the meantime, but it did not so much contribute to improve the situation as to increase the confusion all the more among the scholars. Thus the myth of“a philosopher Algazel”itself lasted almost unimpaired until S. Munk finally demythologized it in the middle of the 19th century by correctly identifying al-Ghazālī's true intention and thought. As more writings of al-Ghazālī came to be printed and published toward the end of the century, the study of al-Ghazālī made much progress. Profiting from all this study and that on Islamic history in general, D. B. Macdonald published his monumental study on al-Ghazālī at the turn of the century in an article,“The Life of al-Ghazzali”(1899), which laid the foundation for the subsequent study in this field. He also spotted and gave some proper pioneering discussions to the essential questions involved in the study, such as the problems of his“esoteric teachings,”the authenticity of his writings, the causes of his retirement, and so forth. (To be continued)

著者

中村 廣治郎

出版者

東京大学東洋文化研究所

雑誌

東洋文化研究所紀要 (ISSN:05638090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.87, pp.17-50, 1981-11

---

Al-Ghazali wrote several works on (Aristotelian) logic (mantiq). The fact shows the importance of logic in his whole system of thought. This is particularly and uniquely so, except Islamic philosophers (failasūf), in the general negative attitude of the traditional Muslim scholars against logic. Nevertheless, these writings have not adequately been studied in an attempt to clarify the significance of al-Ghazali's logical study and thought in the history of Islamic theology as well as in the development of his personal religious thought. The aim of the present article is to analyse these works of al-Ghazali with a view to clarify his attitude to logic and point out some problems for further study. We come to the conclusion that al-Ghazali not only baldly accepts Aristotelian logic totally, but goes so far as to islamicize it in the Qur'ānic terms. This leads us to the questions: (1) What is the reason for this attitude of his? My tentative answer is: the usefullness of logic and its superiority to the traditional (legal) method of reasoning (qiyās). (2) The influence of al-Ghazali's logical study in later development of Islamic theology, with particular reference to Ibn Khaldun's comments on it in his al-Muqaddimah. (3) The problem of apparent contradiction of al-Ghazali's positive reliance on reason (‘aql) shown in those logical works and his negative attitude to reason in his autobiography, al-Munqidh min al-Dalāl.

著者

山口 裕人 ヤマグチ ヒロヒト Yamaguchi Hirohito

出版者

大阪大学大学院文学研究科哲学講座

雑誌

メタフュシカ (ISSN:13426508)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.37, pp.41-54, 2006-12-25

著者

村山 淳子

出版者

早稲田大学法学会

雑誌

早稻田法學 (ISSN:03890546)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.84, no.3, pp.251-281, 2009-03-20

著者

荒川 佳樹

出版者

Waseda University

巻号頁・発行日

2005-03

---

制度:新 ; 文部省報告番号:乙1944号 ; 学位の種類:博士(工学) ; 授与年月日:2005/3/3 ; 早大学位記番号:新4024

著者

木戸 光子

出版者

筑波大学留学生センター

雑誌

筑波大学留学生センター日本語教育論集 (ISSN:13481363)

巻号頁・発行日

no.13, pp.1-21, 1998-02-20

---

新聞5 紙(朝日,産経,日経,毎日,読売)に1994 年春に掲載された日米台青少年意識調査アンケート結果の報道記事について,言語形式上の特徴と配列の2 つの観点から文章構造の分析を通して,文章構造の違いが生じる要因を探った。新聞記事は一般に構成が決まっていると言われるが,5 つの文章を分析した結果,文章構造の型は頭括型・双括型・散括型・尾括型のうちいくつかの可能性があり,また,同じ頭括型でも文章の展開の様相は異なることがわかった。さらに,文章の総括には内容語的な総括と機能語的な総括があること,意味内容の構造と文脈の切れ続きの構造が必ずしも一致するとは限らないことを指摘した。Based on an analysis of the discourse markers and the ordering of topics and comments used in five newspaper reports on a survey of high school students'attitudes in Japan, the United States and Taiwan. I demonstrate that these reports do nat have a common structure. The structure of each report was unified by one or two of the following discourse parts; 1) initial part, 2) final part, 3) initial and final part, 4) other parts. I show that the flow of discourse may often vary even among reports with the same discourse structure. I observe that the unification of discourse structure is determined by the content or function of the final sentence, and that the discourse structure indicated by discourse markers does not always match the ordering of the content structure of the report.

著者

小川 茂

出版者

上越教育大学学校教育実践研究センター

雑誌

教育実践研究

巻号頁・発行日

pp.185-190, 2011-03

著者

Yamamoto T Mizoguchi T Tanaka I

出版者

AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOC

雑誌

PHYSICAL REVIEW B (ISSN:10980121)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.71, no.24, 2005-06

被引用文献数

48 51

著者

藤内 哲也 Tetsuya Tonai

雑誌

関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)

巻号頁・発行日

no.33, pp.11-18, 2010-03-30

著者

入矢 義高

出版者

中國文學會

雑誌

中國文學報 (ISSN:05780934)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.21, pp.146-162, 1966-10

著者

浜野 兼一

出版者

早稲田大学大学院教育学研究科

雑誌

早稲田大学大学院 教育学研究科紀要 別冊 (ISSN:13402218)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, no.1, pp.59-68, 2004-09-30

著者

宮盛 邦友

出版者

北海道大学大学院教育学研究院

雑誌

北海道大学大学院教育学研究院紀要 (ISSN:18821669)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.119, pp.177-195, 2013-12-25

---

The purpose of this paper makes the research theme clear through analysis the important studiesin Japan and Europe about the childhood and the child’s idea. The themes of analysis are follow;The first, the sciences of the development of Morikazu Katsuta in Japan. The second, the sciencesof the child of Jean-Jacques Rousseau in France. The third, the sciences of the children’s history of Philippe Aries and the controversy about it in West. The fourth, the sciences of the child and thedevelopment in global age and its possibilities in America. The childhood and the child’s idea isthe educational thought that demands the child and the development relatively as ‘the discoveryof the child’. The child and the development are the historical concepts having the concept of thestate, the nation and the government since the modern, that is‘the children and the state’. In theglobal age, it is very important that we try to the reconstruction the childhood and the child’s idea and the development’s concept based the children and the state.

著者

久保田 広

出版者

東京大学生産技術研究所

雑誌

生産研究 (ISSN:0037105X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.15, no.10, pp.410-414, 1963-10-01

---

レーザの発達につれて光のcoherencyという問題がとりあげられてきた.coherencyというのは直訳すれば可干渉性ということである.しかし光というものはマックスウェルの微分方程式の解として与えられ,この微分方程式は線型であるから,その解の重ね合せもまた解である.これを干渉というならば,どのような光でも完全に可干渉のはずであり,干渉性をうんぬんするということはおかしい.しかし実際には同一光源をほぼ同時に出た光でなければ干渉縞は観測されず,同一光源でも時間を隔って出た二つの光は,その時間に比例して可干渉性が悪くなるという実験事実がある.これはどのように説明されるかをのべ,これを応用した二三の測定法の例をあげてみよう.

著者

狭間 直樹

出版者

霞山会

雑誌

東亜 (ISSN:03873862)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.415, pp.67-73, 2002-01

著者

鵜飼 昌男

出版者

東洋史研究會

雑誌

東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.56, no.3, pp.466-492, 1997-12-31

著者

徳弘 康代

出版者

[出版者不明]

巻号頁・発行日

2006-03

---

制度:新 ; 文部省報告番号:甲2231号 ; 学位の種類:博士(日本語教育学) ; 授与年月日:2006/3/15 ; 早大学位記番号:新4252

著者

篠田 徹

雑誌

早稲田社会科学総合研究 = Waseda studies in social sciences (ISSN:13457640)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.7, no.3, pp.13-37, 2007-03-25

著者

Kimoto Masahiro キモト マサヒロ 木本 雅博

---

24651

著者

中島 弘至

出版者

東京大学大学院教育学研究科

雑誌

東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13421050)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.53, pp.123-134, 2014-03-28

---

In recent years, the diversification of entrance examinations is in progress in each university. Not the ability of person is limited to academic achievement, various abilities should be recognized. Students receive various stimuli from many students with different cultures on campus. The atmosphere of each university will be more and more rich. But entrance examinations without writing result lower academic achievement of students. They are the serious problem and the quality of guarantee by each university is strongly required. Leading universities are no exception. This effect has appeared in the recruitment of many companies. This means that universities can't guarantee the quality of students. I analyze by game theory what is happening in the recruitment of leading companies in this paper.