2 0 0 0 OA 咀嚼の大切さ

著者
鈴木 隆
出版者
岩手医科大学歯学会
雑誌
岩手医科大学歯学雑誌 (ISSN:03851311)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.1, pp.1-10, 1995-04-30 (Released:2017-06-06)
参考文献数
20
被引用文献数
2

2 0 0 0 OA 官報

著者
大蔵省印刷局 [編]
出版者
日本マイクロ写真
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1916年06月20日, 1916-06-20
著者
ウンサーシュッツ ジャンカーラ
出版者
立正大学心理学研究所
雑誌
立正大学心理学研究所紀要 The journal of the Institute of Psycology, Rissho University (ISSN:24322059)
巻号頁・発行日
no.14, pp.89-99, 2016

It has been widely reported that Japanese naming practices are changing dramatically. Thesechanges are especially important in regards to names and gender. Because one of the most prominentdifferences is the decline of the use of name-exclusive suffixes, which usually express their owner'sgender, their decline suggests that there may be changes in how gender is expressed in names. Thisarticle observed how the characteristics of men's and women's names have changed through usingdata from an approximately 100 year period from Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance. As a result, it was discoveredthat at the beginning of the 20th century, men's names were more diverse than women's, butwomen's names are now similarly or more diverse. In addition, previously popular -ko and -mi suffixesfor women are now essentially out of use, and men's suffixes have all changed. Finally, there were nonames that ranked in the top-10 for any year for both men and women, and the pool of kanji commonbetween men's and women's names was small. From these results, it can be argued that instead ofsuffixes, the use of the kanji themselves can help differentiate the gender of any given name.
著者
神居 文彰
出版者
平等院
雑誌
鳳翔学叢
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, pp.262-227, 2021-03
著者
佐藤 厚
出版者
法政大学キャリアデザイン学部
雑誌
法政大学キャリアデザイン学部紀要 = Bulletin of the Faculty of Lifelong Learning and Career Studies (ISSN:13493043)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.18, pp.107-146, 2021-03

The aim of this paper is to explore the background of the lack of progress in recurrent education in Japan, while comparing Sweden, which is said to be the "advanced" country of recurrent education, with Japan, which is "delayed", from the concept of recurrent education.1 In Sweden, the term of “recurrent education” was used as same meaning of “25:4 rule”. That is the rule which means working adult whose age is more than 25 years old and years of work experience is more than 4 years can enter the university. This rule has set in 1969, but nowadays instead of “recurrent education”, the term “lifelong learning” has been popular in Sweden. Lifelong learning is same meaning as “working adult relearning”. The term of “adult relearning” corresponds to study and learning opportunity for working adult, which includes school education as well as vocational education and training in general.2 On the other hand, in Japan, the term of “recurrent education” was used in council report of lifelong learning in Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.After that, administrative efforts were made, and now it appears as a keyword to promote the "human resource development revolution" of the government's 100-year life concept conference (2017). Lifelong learning and "re-learning for working adults" are synonyms for recurrent education, but the ministry that advocates these words has a strong impression that it is the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Therefore, it is easy to imagine "re-learning for working adults" mainly for school education, especially for working adults at universities, junior colleges, and vocational schools.3 What is important in relation to the above is that in Sweden, labor and management have been involved in recurrent education (although it is weaker than in corporatist countries). The advocacy of recurrent education in Sweden coincided with the rise of industrial democracy and the labor movement in the late 1960s, with the aim of "reorganizing post-secondary education in a new system that includes the shift of labor and learning."4 On the other hand, in Japan, the place for discussing school education (MEXT Central Education Council) and the place for discussing vocational ability development (vocational ability development council) are separated, and government, labor and management are in charge of school education and vocational education. The process of making policy decisions while being involved in the overall form of training is unclear and immature. Regarding labor-management relations, there are cross-company (industry-specific) negotiations such as the spring labor offensive(“Shunto” in Japanese), but the company based labor union is the main body, and the priority of demand for education and training is generally low. In fact, according to the research result of the Japanese Trade Union Cnfederations Research Institute for Advancement of Living Standard 2019, the priority of education and training and self-development in the requirements for management at the single group headquarters is low.5 However, what should not be overlooked is that behind the low priority of union demands for education and training, there is an in-house education and training system centered on OJT and Off-JT that assume long-term employment. That is the point. In other words, the Japanese training regime is a large corporate-centric segmentalist, that is, Japanese vocational development relies on corporate education and training rather than school or public vocational training (Sato 2016; Sato 2019). Sato 2020). Then, the reason why recurrent education is not widespread is that, ironically, in-house education and training are sufficiently conducted.The problem is that the knowledge and skills formed by education and training belong to companies rather than individuals (Sato 2020: 135). If the training regime is collective, the subject of recurrent education should be the individual, knowledge and skills should belong to the individual, and the knowledge and knowledge that an individual needs at a VET training institution, including a school, for his or her career. Acquire skills and form a career in a cross-company labor market. However, in the case of Japan, there are circumstances in which this is not the case. These are the things to keep in mind when thinking about recurrent education in Japan.
著者
杉本 俊介
出版者
日本経営倫理学会
雑誌
日本経営倫理学会誌 (ISSN:13436627)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, pp.199-211, 2017

The moral justification for external whistleblowing has been the subject of significant recent debate. The main arguments on either side have been drawn from either consequentialism or deontology. Recently, some scholars have argued that these arguments miss two points:'tragicality'and the moral remainder. These scholars intend their critiques to show insufficiencies rather than defects in the consequentialist and deontological accounts. However, these critiques may instead be taken to show that alternative approaches are more suitable for an analysis of external whistleblowing. Drawing on this suggestion, in this paper, I defend a virtue ethics approach to the justifiability of external whistleblowing.
著者
太郎丸 博
出版者
数理社会学会
雑誌
理論と方法 (ISSN:09131442)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, no.2, pp.277-278, 2020 (Released:2021-09-04)
著者
小島 浩之
出版者
国公私立大学図書館協力委員会
雑誌
大学図書館研究 (ISSN:03860507)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.64, pp.1-9, 2002-03-31 (Released:2017-12-19)

中国では80年代後半から図書や出版の標準化が進められた。これに伴い標題紙,版権頁といった情報源もISOに準拠して標準化され,同時に出版者はCIPデータの提出と表示を義務づけられた。こういった情報源の標準化は1990年からほぼ10年間で成し遂げられた。したがって90年代以降に出版された中国書は,書誌構造を捉え易くなっている。これに対し80年代以前の図書は原則論が必ずしも通用するとは限らず,書誌構造を把握しにくい場合も多い。