ランキング (合計) - Ceek.jp Altmetrics

2 0 0 0 OA 南原繁における秩序の構想価値並行論と日本的キリスト教を中心に

著者: 鏑木政彦
出版者: 西日本哲学会
雑誌: 西日本哲学年報 (ISSN:09197982)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.28, pp.63, 2020 (Released:2021-05-06)

2 0 0 0 OA 社会的事実の存在論的構造「アンカー個人主義」を再考する

著者: 倉田剛
出版者: 西日本哲学会
雑誌: 西日本哲学年報 (ISSN:09197982)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.27, pp.65, 2019 (Released:2021-05-06)

2 0 0 0 OA 患者・家族の個別ニーズに応答する看護師のケアを支えるもの

著者: 古田真弥子宮脇美保子
出版者: 日本医学哲学・倫理学会
雑誌: 医学哲学医学倫理 (ISSN:02896427)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.38, pp.31-40, 2020 (Released:2022-07-20)

2 0 0 0 OA 未知なるものがもたらす心身の変様治療文化論から

著者: 森岡正芳
出版者: 宗教哲学会
雑誌: 宗教哲学研究 (ISSN:02897105)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.39, pp.29-42, 2022 (Released:2022-06-05)

From the standpoint of the theory of the therapy in culture, this paper describes how the COVID-19 disaster has transformed the relationship with others, and how the contact with foreign individual, who have different physical experiences and appearances that no one has ever experienced before, is affecting the world of everyday life. In doing so, I drew on the theory of the affect and the empathy from Vygotsky, Spinoza, Bin Kimura, and Edith Stein. I focused on the micro-genetic change of bodily experience and the sensual experience of otherness. It is hypothesized that such a sense of difference could also be an opportunity to open unknown parts of the self. In the process of mind-body transformation, I can read the basic bi-directional movement of the strange into the familiar and the familiar into the strange. The incorporation of this basic movement into the reconstruction of empathic relationships with others suggests a path of self-reconstitution in a world full of threats to the unknown.

2 0 0 0 OA 松王政浩著『科学哲学からのメッセージ:因果・実在・価値をめぐる科学との接点』

著者: 清水右郷
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.54, no.2, pp.155-158, 2022-03-31 (Released:2022-03-31)

2 0 0 0 OA 植原亮著『思考力改善ドリル:批判的思考から科学的思考へ』

著者: 鈴木真奈
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.54, no.2, pp.147-149, 2022-03-31 (Released:2022-03-31)
参考文献数: 3

2 0 0 0 OA 意味と理解──『哲学探究』の「ギャップ」に寄せて

著者: 丸田健
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.54, no.1, pp.1-1, 2021-09-30 (Released:2021-09-30)
参考文献数: 33

Does (the former) “Part II” of the Philosophical Investigations represent departures for new directions toward the “philosophy of psychology”? In this article, we will go back to Wittgenstein's pre-Investigations writings and see that the examination of the concept of meaning experiences, together with the examination of other “peculiar” psychological experiences, constitutes a driving force within his later philosophy. In particular, we will note that Part II of the Brown Book deals predominantly with themes from the philosophy of psychology, and how Wittgenstein attempts therein to represent descriptions of experiences in terms of the grammar of expression, thereby shunning the Augustinian conception of description. Such interest in meaning experiences and related psychological experiences is not fully reflected in the last sections of “Part I” of the Investigations. In view of Wittgenstein's prior concern, the possibility strongly remains that the now severed “Part II” forms in some way an indispensable part of his unfinished masterpiece.

2 0 0 0 OA 村田純一『味わいの現象学―知覚経験のマルチモダリティ』

著者: 新川拓哉
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.2, pp.331-335, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)

2 0 0 0 OA 飯田隆『虹と空の存在論』

著者: 加地大介
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.2, pp.324-327, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)

2 0 0 0 OA 「付録B」タイプ理論とは何だったのか

著者: 野村恭史
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.2, pp.45-63, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数: 18

In the “Appendix B” to his Principles of Mathematics (1903), Bertrand Russell developed a theory of types that is different explicitly from his so-called “ramified” theory of types in Principia Mathematica (1910). It is not easy to evaluate properly this “Appendix B” theory of types, because (A) it is sometimes thought that it is only a rough sketch added hastily, and (B) it seems to play no role for Russellʼs later theoretical developments. But in this paper, I shall show that both (A) and (B) are not correct and that the “Appendix B” theory of types played an important role for his theoretical developments leading to the ramified theory of types.

2 0 0 0 OA 帰納型消去規則としてのウィトゲンシュタインの一意性規則

著者: 岡田光弘
出版者: The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌: 科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.2, pp.95-114, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数: 28

We discuss the equational representations of the elimination rule of inductive types, with a focus on the type “natural number”, in the context of the series of approaches to separating an equational calculus from logic. We go back to a source of the purely equational representation of the elimination rule, Wittgenstein's uniqueness rule. We analyze Wittgenstein's argument, in comparison with others', which gives supplementary remarks to Marion-Okada (2018).