著者
谷岡 明彦
出版者
日本膜学会
雑誌
(ISSN:03851036)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, no.3, pp.100-104, 2010 (Released:2015-06-19)

Electrospray method (in some case called as electrospray deposition: ESD) is a versatile method for forming thin films and non-woven fabrics. This method has the following advantages: (i) applicable for various solute and molten molecules, which have a wide range of molecular weights (e.g., inorganic molecules, synthetic polymers, proteins, and DNA), (ii) polymer thin films with nano/micro–scaled structures, which range from spheres to fibers, are deposited. Electrospray-deposited thin films have recently attracted much attention for applications such as antifouling or biocompatible coatings for medical devices, high–performance filter media, drug delivery systems, biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering, addition of high functionality on membrane surface for water purification and biosensors and biochips (e.g., protein/DNA–microarrays and microfluidic devices).

1 0 0 0 OA 古易断時言

著者
新井白蛾 著
出版者
藤谷敬文堂
巻号頁・発行日
1893
著者
竹内 芳親 遠山 柾雄
出版者
[出版者不明]
巻号頁・発行日
no.22, pp.41-46, 1983 (Released:2011-12-19)
著者
石井 和夫
出版者
東京大学出版会
雑誌
UP (ISSN:09133291)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.42, no.11, pp.7-11, 2013-11
著者
片岡 弘勝
出版者
奈良教育大学
雑誌
奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学 (ISSN:05472393)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.1, pp.1-19, 2016-11-30

The purpose of this article is to clarify the base and moment for generating “subjectivity” in UEHARA Senroku’s “The Dead Person and the living person” theroy, by focussing the “imminency” and “responsibility” for “The Dead Person”. This study analyzed UEHARA’s works texts and clarified the following five points.1. UEHARA proposed the idea of “subjectivity of the living person as media of The Dead Person”. This idea rinks to criticism to religion, that implies to find out the human abilities which have been preserved in the form of religion in histroy.2. In the case of being imminet by message of “The Dead Person” who was killed unjustly, “the living person” is stimulated and roaded to must to check and direct own’s living styles and standpoints of valuing. According to this UEHARA’s theory context, “subjectivity of the living person” is founded by listening the wording of “The Dead Person” intently and correctly.3. This study examined to compare UEHARA’s “subjectivity” theory with Emmanuel Lévinas’s “subjectivity” theory(discussed by UCHIDA Tatsuru). Then this study indicated the following two common factors and two different factors in both theories. One factor of the common factors is the idea that wording of “The Dead Person” directs “the living person”. The other factor is the strong intention for recognizing something”(“etwas”) that is cannot be described by present academic methods, namely “extremly complex realties” and “the dynamics and chaos of human mind”.4. One factor of the different factors is following point. Lévinas used wordings of “withdrawing one’s previous statesments”. However UEHARA used wordings of “checking and bounding one’s previous statesments relatively”. The other factor is following point. Lévinas supposed the “subjectivity” to responsibility for “The Dead Person” in relation to absolute “God”. However UEHARA supposed the “subjectivity” to responsibility for “The Dead Person” in relation to historical recognition to the oath of Shakyamuni and Nichiren in Buddhism thoughts.5. On this discussion context, the momnet of UEHARA’s “subjectivity” is “responsibility” for “The Dead Person” as absolute “The Other Being”. Further, the base of UEHARA’s “subjectivity” is the one’s recognition and standpoints for attaching importance to “reverence to human life” in severe situation that all persons are fronted the risk of being killed and becoming assistants of killers.