著者

丹治 信春

出版者

一般社団法人 日本物理学会

雑誌

大学の物理教育 (ISSN:1340993X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.99, no.2, pp.13-16, 1999-07-15 (Released:2018-04-28)

参考文献数

3

被引用文献数

1

著者

清塚 邦彦

出版者

山形大学

雑誌

山形大学紀要. 人文科学 = Bulletin of Yamagata University. Humanities

巻号頁・発行日

vol.15, no.1, pp.41(268)-74(235), 2002-02-15

---

This paper is a sketch for the philosophical theory of pictorial representation. After introducing the theme of pictorial representation, I shall divide my arguments into two parts. The first part (sec.2-4) contains a series of critiques against ”eliminativist” theories of pictorial representation. By ”eliminativism” I mean those theories which do not recognize the factuality of perception peculiar to pictures at face value. I criticize three theories in particular as specimens of eliminativism: Illusion theory, resemblance theory and convention theory (or semiotic theory). In the second part (sec.5-6), I give an outline of an anti-elimitativist theory of pictorial representation. The theory insists on two points, each of which forms, respectively, a ”natural” and an ”artificial” aspect of the concept of pictorial representation. The first point is that picture perception (perception of images in pictures) is grounded on the twofold operation of the natural abilities of perceptual recognition at a subpersonal level. When we see a picture of a horse, the fact of our looking at the picture triggers, at a sub-personal level, not only the perceptual ability to recognize a plain surface but also the perceptual ability to recognize a horse. As a result, we get a twofold visual experience: what we see is a plain surface of course, but in seeing it, we cannot but have an impression that it is as if we were looking at a horse. This kind of experience is not to be dismissed as mere illusion. It is a natural and normal product of our senses. The second point is that in order that images in pictures get peculiarly representational character, they must be combined with what R.Wollheim called ”standard of correctness”. When we see a natural object (say, a stump in the woods) that happens to look like a bear, we do not say that it ”represents” a bear. It can only be said to ”look like” a bear. But when we see a bear in a picture, we not only say it looks like a bear, but also say that it is, or ”represents”, a bear. And, if someone says that it represents something else, we think that at least either of us must be wrong. Judgements about the representational content of a picture obeys a certain standard which dictates that some judgements are correct and others not. Elucidation of the nature of such standards of correctness forms another essential part of the theory of pictorial representation.

著者

麻生 博之

出版者

日本哲学会

雑誌

哲学 (ISSN:03873358)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2010, no.61, pp.85-104_L7, 2010 (Released:2011-01-18)

参考文献数

26

---

If one were to reread Marx's writings today, which would be the phase of Marx's thought that would merit special attention? In this paper, I find that one core of Marx's thoughts lies in “critique.” I would therefore like to explore the significance that this critique can have as a form of fundamental thought. With this in mind, I want to consider Adorno's and Benjamin's interpretation of Marx's thought, with particular reference to their emphasis on “history”. Adorno characterizes Marx's thought as “a critical theory of society” and thinks that it is only understandable as “a historical theory”. Adorno's view is remarkable in that it characterizes Marx's thought as a form of “interpretation (Deutung)” of “natural history (Naturgeschichte)”. This can be seen as an attempt, on the one hand, to show that various societal realities that should have historical reality appear as something inevitable or as things which obey “the coercion of nature”, but on the other hand, to perceive such realities in the form of something natural or eternal which have become historically, therefore as things which are fundamentally contingent. Benjamin, in contrast, thinks that one core of Marx's thoughts consists in the recognition of history as a “critique” to uncover “the memory of the anonymous (das Gedächtnis der Namenlosen)”. In Benjamin's view, when history up to the present is grasped as something continuous, it is just a “continuum of the oppressors”. Benjamin defines the form of history description that liquidates “the epic element” of this continuous history as “construction”, and tries to understand an essential part of the Marx's thought as such an attempt to explode “the continuum of history” and to rescue “the tradition of the oppressed”.In this paper, through my clarification of Adorno's and Benjamin's understanding of Marx's thought, I attempt to examine the significance of Marx's “critique” of “history” and, through it, offer a worthy topic for further discussion.

著者

平尾 昌宏 ヒラオ マサヒロ Masahiro HIRAO

雑誌

大阪産業大学論集. 人文・社会科学編

巻号頁・発行日

vol.23, pp.1-23, 2015-02

---

本稿は前稿に続く,日本語を糧とした哲学的な思索の試みである。日本語や日本文化を論じる近年の哲学的試みには安易な一般化,飛躍が見られる。そこで前稿では確かな地歩を築くため,問題を「いる/ある」両動詞の用法に絞り,空虚な思弁を避けるため,国語学,日本語学研究を参照した。従来「いる」と「ある」の使い分けは,これらの動詞が述語づけられる主語のカテゴリーと,話者の認識という二つの観点から論じられてきた。だが,この二つの見解はともに厳密には成り立たない。そこで前稿末尾では,両動詞の使い分けは話者と主語との関係を示すという新たな仮説を提示した。本稿では,この仮説と従来の二説との関係を考察し,次の諸点を指摘する。(1)これら三説中でわれわれの仮説が最も一般的で,従来の二説を包括できること,(2)しかし,その一般性の故に,われわれの仮説はまだ内実を欠くこと,(3)ただ,従来の二説をわれわれの仮説に基づいた例文解釈のパラメータとして利用できることである。

著者

本多 英太郎 ホンダ H. HONDA

雑誌

紀要. 言語・文学編

巻号頁・発行日

vol.38, pp.69-94, 2006-03-30

著者

田上鈍夫 著

出版者

太平洋書房

巻号頁・発行日

1965

著者

鈴木 貴之 大澤 博隆 清田 陽司 三宅 陽一郎 大内 孝子

出版者

一般社団法人 人工知能学会

雑誌

人工知能 (ISSN:21882266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.37, no.5, pp.649-660, 2022-09-01 (Released:2022-09-01)

著者

小笠原 朋子 Tomoko Ogasawara

出版者

学習院大学哲学会

雑誌

哲学会誌 = Annual of the Philosophical Society, Gakushuin University (ISSN:03886247)

巻号頁・発行日

no.34, pp.67-84, 2010-05-01

著者

平尾 昌宏

雑誌

大阪産業大学論集. 人文・社会科学編 = Journal of Osaka Sangyo University. Humanities & Social Sciences (ISSN:18825966)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, pp.53-71, 2016-06

著者

北居 明

出版者

稲盛和夫研究会・稲盛ライブラリー

雑誌

稲盛和夫研究 (ISSN:2436827X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, no.1, pp.93-110, 2022-03-25 (Released:2022-04-01)

参考文献数

17

---

In this paper, I studied what kind of organizational culture Kazuo Inamori tried to foster in Kyocera by analyzing the message of him published in Kyocera’s in-house newsletter “Respect the Divine and Love People (Keiten-Aijin)”. Through the quantitative text analysis, it’s found that since 1973, his remarks have increased dramatically, and he tried to convey a lot of messages to employees in response to changes in the environment inside and outside the country.What is characteristic of the content of the remark is the large number of words “heart (Kokoro)”. It is probable that Kyocera’s values, which Inamori himself called “heart-based” management, were reflected in the in-house newsletter. The content of the remarks varied from year to year, and there was a change in the relative frequency of mentions, especially in the 1970s and after 1981. In the 1970s, there were relatively many references to issues, policies, and goals within the company, but since 1981, there has been an increase in references to the inside of people. It seems that this is because Inamori tried to extract Kyocera’s values and management principles from his own experience and pass them on to employees before he retired from the front line.At the same time, the meaning of “heart” seems to have become more multifaceted and fertile. In addition to the good intentions and sincerity that form the basis of people’s relationships of trust, the “heart” has come to represent the criteria for decision-making and the driving force for realizing aspirations. Finally, I mention some future issues.

著者

川戸 好武

出版者

日本哲学会

雑誌

哲学 (ISSN:03873358)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1963, no.13, pp.31-47, 1963-03-31 (Released:2009-07-23)

参考文献数

32

著者

草薙 正夫

出版者

美学会

雑誌

美学 (ISSN:05200962)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.10, no.1, pp.13-24, 1959-06-30 (Released:2017-05-22)

---

Art aims neither at the fastidious elaboration of form nor at the sensual intoxication. Its proper function consists, through its visibility, in representing "being as such", not in embodying a specific ideal of beauty. This metaphisical view of art, considered as "the organon of philosophy" has been a traditional one since Aristotle. But it is not free from the "imitation-theory", for here "being as such" is considered merely objectively, not existentially. Art, however, must be existential par excellence, in so far as it depends upon the free activity of creation, since "being as such" is not essentially objective wholeness, but non-objective and encompassing one. In this sense art is, according to Jaspers, the illustration of existence, and the philosophy of art does not mean thinking about art, but thinking in art. This is what Jaspers means by art as "the organon of philosophy". This treatise aims at elucidating the existential point of view of art, following Jaspers's philosophy of art-especially through his elucidation of the structure of "cipher reading".

著者

戸塚 法子 Noriko Totsuka

雑誌

淑徳大学研究紀要. 総合福祉学部・コミュニティ政策学部 = Shukutoku University bulletin. College of Integrated Human and Social Welfare Studies, College of Community Studies (ISSN:21856346)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.56, pp.247-261, 2022-03-01

---

我が国のソーシャルワークが今後どのような視座を携え,人々をその苦しみから救うことができるのか。日本の文化や風土の影響を享けつつ今までの時代のなかで一定の貢献をしてきたアジア型援助原理に相当する仏教哲学・仏教教義が,ソーシャルワークにどのような課題を発信してきたのかについて,日本仏教社会福祉学会年報に掲載された研究論文を解題するなかで整理し検討していった。

著者

横田 祐美子

出版者

立命館大学国際言語文化研究所

雑誌

立命館言語文化研究 (ISSN:09157816)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.32, no.3, pp.87-98, 2020-12

著者

片岡 暁夫 大島 徹 近藤 良享

出版者

日本体育・スポーツ哲学会

雑誌

体育・スポーツ哲学研究 (ISSN:09155104)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, no.1, pp.3-12, 1989 (Released:2010-04-30)

著者

藤本 穣彦

出版者

静岡哲学会

雑誌

文化と哲学

巻号頁・発行日

vol.34, pp.53-68, 2017-07-31

著者

根本 彰

出版者

日本図書館研究会

雑誌

図書館界 (ISSN:00409669)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.60, no.4, pp.280-282, 2008-11-01 (Released:2017-05-24)

著者

堀田 義太郎

出版者

東京理科大学

雑誌

若手研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2014-04-01

---

差別概念の哲学的な分析論の主要な議論を検討した。①被差別者に与える害や不利益に注目する帰結主義的な立場としての不利益説、②差別者の動機や悪意に注目する悪意説、③帰結にも意図にも還元できない「意味」があるという意味説を検討した。現在の議論では不利益説が主流である。不利益説は差別がもたらす害悪の大きさに関する直観にも適合しており一定の説得力がある。本研究では、しかしこの立場では十分に差別の悪質さを分析することはできないことを明らかにし、意味説に一定の利点があることを確認した。差別の悪質さを評価するための規範的な根拠の解明が今後の課題である。

著者

緑川 信之

出版者

日本図書館情報学会

雑誌

日本図書館情報学会誌 (ISSN:13448668)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.68, no.2, pp.135-136, 2022 (Released:2022-06-30)

著者

野本 和幸

出版者

日本哲学会

雑誌

哲学 (ISSN:03873358)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1981, no.31, pp.57-83, 1981-05-01 (Released:2009-07-23)