著者
黒澤 勉
出版者
岩手医科大学
雑誌
医事学研究 (ISSN:09126597)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, pp.111-128, 2002-12-10
著者
軸丸 勇士 大森 美枝子 田代 恵 照山 勝哉 中谷 京一 河野 志津子
出版者
一般社団法人 日本科学教育学会
雑誌
日本科学教育学会研究会研究報告 (ISSN:18824684)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.4, pp.39-44, 2005-11-26 (Released:2017-11-17)
参考文献数
5

野生ニホンザルの生息地の一つである高崎山自然動物園(大分市)。その山の麓に平成16(2004)年4月, 学習施設「おさる館」が開館した。山や館を訪れた人々のニーズをアンケートにより掴み, それを活用した見学や学習支援のための人材育成とその手法について紹介し, 連携した科学教育の必要性を述べる。
著者
松島 脩平 原田 宏幸
出版者
一般社団法人 日本機械学会
雑誌
ロボティクス・メカトロニクス講演会講演概要集 2017 (ISSN:24243124)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.1P2-H12, 2017 (Released:2017-11-25)

3D printers are becoming popular and using in many scenes. They enable to make products simply and rapidly according to the design models. However, they can make only a single bulk parts at a time in general. If we can make a whole robot structure at once by 3d printer, it became possible to manufacture a desired robot on the spot in a minute. In this report, we propose a method for making a robot structure including joints at one time by a Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) type 3D printer. It is unnecessary to assemble after printing. Further, we produced a wire-driven quadruped walking robot as an example of the proposed method.
著者
鈴木 信貴
出版者
特定非営利活動法人 グローバルビジネスリサーチセンター
雑誌
赤門マネジメント・レビュー (ISSN:13485504)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.9, no.9, pp.635-662, 2010-09-25 (Released:2018-02-25)
参考文献数
32

モジュール型産業では、部品メーカーが競争優位を持ち、組立メーカーはなかなか競争優位を獲得することが難しいといわれている。戦後、日本の工作機械産業は、モジュール化によって世界市場を席巻したが、やはり、部品メーカーが競争優位を持ち、工作機械メーカーは競争力を失っていった。本稿では、モジュール化が進展した日本の工作機械産業において、複合加工機の開発に成功したヤマザキマザックの事例から、日本とアメリカという特性が異なる市場を活用し、探索的な技術融合と組織内外の幅広い提携活動によって、段階的に製品のインテグリティーを高め、競争優位を獲得したケースを分析する。
著者
裵 相均
出版者
中央大学
巻号頁・発行日
2015

【学位授与機関】中央大学【学位の種類】博士(法学)【学位記番号】法博甲第109号【学位授与の日付】2015年3月19日【学位授与の要件】中央大学学位規則第4条第1項【論文審査委員主査】只木 誠(中央大学法学部教授)【論文審査委員副査】伊藤 康一郎(中央大学法学部教授),鈴木 彰雄(中央大学法学部教授)
著者
Seijirow GOYA Nobuyuki KANNO Kenji TESHIMA Takanori ANNDO Takahiro FUJIOKA
出版者
JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE
雑誌
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science (ISSN:09167250)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.17-0509, (Released:2018-06-06)
被引用文献数
5

A 4-year-old, 5.9-kg female Japanese Spitz presented with syncope and exercise intolerance. Echocardiography revealed an ostium primum atrial septal defect (ASD), a cleft mitral valve, mitral valve regurgitation (MR), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (velocity: 3.6 m/sec, pressure gradient: 52 mmHg), leading to a diagnosis of partial atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) with moderate pulmonary hypertension (PH). Open-heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass was performed through right atriotomy. The cleft of the mitral valve was sutured with polypropylene and the AVSD was closed using an autologous pericardial patch fixed with glutaraldehyde. No postoperative pulmonary hypertensive crisis occurred. Shunting flow through the ASD, TR, and PH had completely disappeared 2 months postoperatively; however, moderate MR persisted. The dog is still alive 5 years postoperatively without clinical signs.
著者
鎌田 雅年
出版者
日本西洋古典学会
雑誌
西洋古典学研究 (ISSN:04479114)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.45, pp.50-60, 1997-03-10 (Released:2017-05-23)

In Plato's Apology, Socrates claims that he knows nothing good on the one hand and indicates almost absolute confidence concerning the righteousness of his philosophical activities on the other. I think the latter appears in this claim of knowledge of his. "I know it is evil and disgraceful to do injustice and to disobey my superior, god or man."(29b) What is the relationship between this claim of knowledge and his consciousness of knowing nothing good and how does this claim of knowledge make him confident? G. Vlastos thinks Socrates had a special kind of knowledge and so a certain extent of virtue and therefore thought his life was happy. Vlastos regarded Socrates' knowledge in the weaker sense as elenctically justifiable beliefs and considered Socrates' conviction dependant on such knowledge. According to Vlastos, such knowledge always has 'a security-gap,' i. e. the possibility of being false. However, we do not want to decrease this 'gap' at the expense of our daily utilities and try to live with this fallible knowledge. The trial described in the Apology is not a daily event but a situation unavoidable for Socrates' life and death. For this reason, I can not think that the basis for deciding whether our way of life is just or not is on the same level as a simple decision in daily life. Therefore, even if the knowledge in 29b is fallible knowledge in Vlastos' sense, I think it can not explain Socrates' moral conviction about the righteousness of his philosophical activities. In the Apology, one aspect of the knowledge Socrates ascribes to himself is the so-called 'consciousness of ignorance.' Socrates brings forward the god of Delphi as a witness to his knowledge. On his first interpretation of the oracle of Delphi, the god of Delphi allows only Socrates' consciousness of ignorance as a kind of knowledge. The knowledge claimed in 29b and 37b includes moral judgements. Therefore, Socrates' basis for this knowledge has been thoroughly discussed in relation to his claim of consciousness of ignorance. One way to resolve this problem is to take it into account that Socrates apologizes during his trial. In a trial, it is necessary not only to clearly tell his audience what he knows, but also to clarify the basis of his knowledge. But does he need to show the basis of the knowledge-claims in 29b and 37b? What he said there is, if we take his words at their face value, self-evident to his audience, but recognizing what is implied, we(and also his audience)can not accept Socrates' words easily. Namely, he says he chooses the death penalty rather than the banishment from his country. This is what anyone in his audience would expect, but could not be persuaded easily. For without any other condition, anyone of us would wish to avoid the death penalty. But Socrates had an inviolable condition. So in the Apology 29b, he does not simply claim the truth of his beliefs but also emphasizes that there is a firm basis for the knowledge-claim and that he had a resolute will to behave according to his beliefs. I think the very basis which he was ready to bring forward as his witness is at the core of his moral conviction. Socrates brings forward the god of Delphi as a witness for the knowledge-claim in 29b and 37b. However, as previously said, the oracle of Delphi does not issue substantive statements or commands. In short, he 'interprets' the oracle as a command of the god and on this interpretation relates his consciousness of his ignorance to the knowledge claimed in 29b and 37b. I think this interpretation makes his conviction firmer. For the basis of his knowledge is what Socrates can not doubt the truth of, i. e. the oracle of Delphi brought to Socrates from an external source. In addition, he accepted this oracle as seriously as his own consciousness after prolonged philosophical activity(View PDF for the rest of the abstract.)