著者
池庄司 民夫
出版者
物性研究刊行会
雑誌
物性研究 (ISSN:05272997)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.68, no.2, pp.216-218, 1997-05-20

この論文は国立情報学研究所の電子図書館事業により電子化されました。
著者
庄 ゆかり 矢田 俊文
出版者
大学ICT推進協議会
雑誌
大学ICT推進協議会年次大会論文集 (ISSN:21867127)
巻号頁・発行日
no.2011, pp.393-398, 2011-12

データベース出版社が実施するウェビナー(Webinar = ウェブ・セミナーの省略形)は、受講場所を問わない利便性が評価されるが、初心者には対面講習会が好まれる場合もある。広島大学中央図書館では、トムソン・ロイター社提供のウェビナーにおいて、図書館会場と講師とのリアルタイムな音声対話を実現し、図書館員がコンピュータ操作およびコミュニケーションを補助するファシリテーターとなる講習会を実施したので、一事例として報告する。
著者
楜澤 雅子
雑誌
人文研究 (ISSN:04913329)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.34, no.8, pp.400-415, 1982
著者
岩松 浅夫
出版者
東京大学東洋文化研究所
雑誌
東洋文化研究所紀要 (ISSN:05638089)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.123, pp.209-246, 1994-02

It has long been said (and generally accepted) that no traces of Amida-Buddha (Amitāyus or Amitābha in Sanskrit) belief or cult had not been found in India itself, in spite of the origination of this belief or cult in that country-especially in North-Western region including Gandhara (and Taxila)-being apparant. About ten or twenty years ago two Gandharan-styled statues were made public separately, one in 1973 by Dr. J. C. Harle and the other in 1982 by Prof. J. Brough. Each of them seems, at least to the present auther, to have much significance in the above-mentioned problem of the evidence of the Amida-Buddha belief or cult in India; for the former statue contains in it a Bodhisattva figure in whose turban-shaped crown is sitting a small Buddha in meditation or dhyāna pose (see fig. 3), and the latter has in its pedestal an inscription in which is found the word ‘amridaha’ as the name of the Buddha (as to the latter statue, see fig. 4). With regard to these statues comments or mentions have been done by some scholars, yet any of them does not seem wholly satisfactory. Then, here the present auther tries some consideration to these two statues apart from such opinions; and through it he comes to a conclusion of his own, which supposes not only that either of these two was made as an Amida-Buddha triad (or quintet) but also that most of the similar-shaped statues which have been thought of by A. Foucher (and other scholars after him) as those of the ‘Great Miracle at Crâvastî’ might have been the same, that is, those of Amida-Buddha triad (or quintet, or of his paradise Sukhāvatī: for example, see fig. 1). In addition to this, he surmises consequently that this North-Western region-including Gandhara and Taxila-where flourished the so-called Gandharan Art for several centuries A. D. must have been the main center of the Amida-Buddha belief or cult in India until at the earliest fourth or fifth century A. D.
著者
鈴木 直哉 小黒 久史 郭 素梅 佐藤 美恵 阿山 みよし 春日 正男
出版者
一般社団法人映像情報メディア学会
雑誌
映像情報メディア学会技術報告 (ISSN:13426893)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.32, no.35, pp.19-20, 2008-08-21
被引用文献数
1

両眼の視差情報は距離を知覚する上で,重要な役割を担っている.本研究では,映像の表示サイズと視差情報の調整によって知覚されるスクリーン距離の組み合わせが感性評価に及ぼす影響について調査することを目的する.偏光立体視の手法を利用し,表示サイズと知覚される距離との組み合わせを変化させた場合の,映像の印象を測定する評価実験を行い,その結果より各評価語が示す印象の鑑賞環境依存性やその相互関係を検討する.
著者
藤川 達也 縄手 雅彦
出版者
一般社団法人映像情報メディア学会
雑誌
映像情報メディア学会技術報告 (ISSN:13426893)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, no.16, pp.43-46, 2011-03-08

我々は15インチと4インチの2つの画面を使用して,画面中央に呈示された幾何学図形のオブジェクトの変化と画面端にスクロールして呈示された文章に対する注意が画面サイズに依存するか検討した.15インチと4インチの画面の文章の正解率と図形変化の検出に有意な差はなかった.主観的な評価においては,多くの協力者が15インチの画面が見やすいと回答した.しかし,実際には図形の変化に関しては4インチの画面の方が成績がよい協力者が多かった.この結果は,我々がこれまでに行った研究と一致していた.
著者
一色 大悟
出版者
東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室
雑誌
インド哲学仏教学研究 (ISSN:09197907)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.16, pp.39-54, 2009-03-31

In early buddhist sūtra texts “asaṃskṛta” is a term used as a synonym for nirvāṇa, the ultimate purpose of buddhists. Disciples in Sarvāstivāda, one of the most influential buddhist sects in india, regarded asaṃskṛta as dharma, and in their abhidharma texts they classified three kinds of dharma, that is to say pratisaṃkhyānirodha, apratisaṃkhyānirodha and ākāśa, into asaṃskṛtadharma. According to the Vaibhāṣika orthodoxy these three asaṃskṛtadharmas are real-entities ( dravyasat ); on the other hand scholars of Sautrāntika / Dārṣṭāntika denied the real-entityness of them. This article deals with the controversy about real-entityness of asaṃskṛtadharmas appeared in abhidharma texts, in particular *Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣā (『阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論』, MV ), *Tattvasiddhi (『成實論』, TS ), Abhidharmakośabhāṣya ( AKBh ) and *Nyāyānusāriṇī (『阿毘達磨順正理論』, NA ). The argument for acknowledging the real-entityness of asaṃskṛtadharmas in TS, AKBh and NA is grounded on the possibility of cognizing intrinsic nature ( svabhāva ) of asaṃskṛtadharmas.And scholars who accepted this argument considered that the possibility can be reasoned from the possibility of cognizing results of activities of intrinsic nature. Saṅghabhadra, the author of NA, affirmed that ākāśa has an activity of receiving ākāṣadhātu and that apratisaṃkhyā-nirodha has an activity of constant obstruction to the arising of those factors whose nature is to arise ( 可生法, *utpattidharmaka ). On the other hand in TS, AKBh and NA pratisaṃkhyānirodha is considered as the dharma whose intrinsic nature and an activity can not be cognized by anybody except āryas. Then Vaibhāṣikas who appear in AKBk and Saṅghabhadra reinforced the argument of real-entityness of asaṃskṛtadharmas with finding out their characteristics which are inherent only in beings. According to NA non-beings are neither distinguishable, cognizable, nor describable, but pratisaṃkhyānirodha is not accepted as such a thing, so it is a being. And furthermore, it is not a being as a provisional designation ( prajñaptisat ) by any possibility, therefore it must be a real-entity. From the viewpoint of those who denied the real-entityness of three asaṃskṛtadharmas each of them is a non-being. In TS ākāśa has an active influence on spatial beings with its non-beingness, but pratisaṃkhyānirodha is a mere non-being. And according to AKBh a statement that pratisaṃkhyānirodha exists is only a negation ( pratiṣedhamātra ) and indicate non-beings. Saṅghabhadra considered this “existence” is not only existence as a real entity, but also existence as a provisional designation.
著者
大西 正展
巻号頁・発行日
2011-11-04

報告番号: 乙17578 ; 学位授与年月日: 2011-11-04 ; 学位の種別: 論文博士 ; 学位の種類: 博士(農学) ; 学位記番号: 第17578号 ; 研究科・専攻: 農学生命科学研究科