著者
野村 曜子 山崎 克人 河野 通雄
出版者
神戸大学
雑誌
神戸大学医学部紀要 (ISSN:00756431)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, no.4, pp.239-245, 1998-03-31

^<99m>Tcガラクトシル人血清アルブミンジエチレントリアミン五酢酸 (^<99m>Tc-GSA) は, 肝実質細胞のアシアロ糖蛋白受容体結合性肝シンチグラフィ製剤である。この^<99m>Tc-GSAの新しい体内動態解析法を考案した。本法では^<99m>Tc-GSAは血中と肝の間で双方向の移動のみ存在するとし, 全血液と肝の二つのコンパートメントとそれぞれの速度定数k1 (血液→肝), k2 (肝→血液) の二つのパラメータからなる2コンパートメント2パラメータモデルを設定し, 各コンパートメントの微分方程式を解いた。更に心, 肝の時間放射能曲線を解析し, k1, k2を算出した。その結果k1/k2は肝に対する^<99m>Tc-GSAの結合能を表す指標となった。また理論的最大肝摂取量としてVLmg (mg/3mgGSA) を定義した。次に肝障害が疑われた6例を対象として従来の指標 (HH15, LHL15, LHL/HH, LU15) と2コンパートメント2パラメータモデルに基づくk1, k2, k1/k2, VLmgを算出した。そして各指標と肝機能検査値との相関, 各指標間の相関を検討した。その結果, k1/k2とVLmgはLU15以外の従来の指標と良好な相関を示し, 肝機能検査値では血清アルブミン値, LAPと良好な相関を示した。2コンパートメント2パラメータモデル法はこれまで報告された動態解析法の中でも最も簡便かつ非侵襲的であり, 得られるk1/k2及びVLmgは肝機能指標として臨床応用の可能性が示唆された。
著者
林 幸雄
出版者
一般社団法人電子情報通信学会
雑誌
電子情報通信学会技術研究報告. IN, 情報ネットワーク (ISSN:09135685)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.106, no.420, pp.37-42, 2006-12-07

社会的な知人やビジネス協力関係,電子メールの送受信関係,ルータやASレベルのインターネット接続関係,生物の代謝系などの現実の多くの複雑なネットワークには,任意のノード間が平均的に短いパスでつながり,次数分布がべき乗則に従うという,「小さな世界」と「スケールフリー」という特徴がある.多くの低次数ノードと少数の高次数のハブで構成されるそのヘテロなネットワークの結合性は,ランダム故障には頑健である反面,ハブへの集中攻撃には脆弱で,特にパケット転送許容量を越えた過負荷の伝搬によるカスケード故障に脆いことが知られている.本講演では,スケールフリーネットワークの分散的で単純な生成機構とその頑健性の理論予測を紹介し,ランダムなリンク張替えが結合耐性の維持に効果的であることをいくつかの実験結果から示す.どのようなタイプのトポロジー制御が大規模通信網に通しているかについても議論したい.
著者
松澤 由香里 山城 明宏
出版者
一般社団法人情報処理学会
雑誌
情報処理学会研究報告ソフトウェア工学(SE) (ISSN:09196072)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1996, no.32, pp.73-80, 1996-03-22

オブジェクト指向開発を実システムに適用するためには、適切なオブジェクトの選択と大規模システムに対応するための分業化指針が重要な用件となる。この2点の要件に対応する手段として、問題分野に特化したパターンの利用と、OMT法を分業開発用にカスタマイズしたOMT?CD法を提案する。本稿では、特にGUIアプリケーションにおいて最適とされるMVCモデルを実システムに適用した具体的手順と、MVCモデルを利用したサブシステム分割による分業開発法OMT?CD法の運用手順を述べ、評価を行なう。MVCモデルを利用したクラス構造は頑強なものであり、またOMT?CD法により設計/実装における作業効率の向上が確認できた。This paper proposes how to use the MVC Model and the OMT-CD (Cooperative Development) method to architect large scale GUI application. When we develop an actual system, two important guidelines are missing in traditional Object-Oriented development: One is a guide for object's extraction and the other is a guide for cooperative development. To make these guidelines, we firstly applied the MVC model which is one of an effective pattern in GUI domain. Secondly, we constructed a class architecture and then divided the system into subsystems, which are cooperative development unit. The class architecture based on the MVC model is robust and the application of the OMT-CD method can improve the productivity of Object-Oriented software.
著者
丸山 宏 荻野 紫穂
出版者
一般社団法人情報処理学会
雑誌
情報処理学会論文誌 (ISSN:18827764)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, no.7, pp.1293-1299, 1994-07-15
被引用文献数
19

日本語の形態素解析は正規文法で行えるとされてきたが、今までの形態素解析システムでは、文法は接続表の形で記述されてきた。本論文では、文法を正規文法の生成規則として記述する形態素解析システムについて述ぺ、その利点と限界について議論する。
著者
小川 圭治
出版者
東京女子大学
雑誌
東京女子大學論集 (ISSN:04934350)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.11, no.1, pp.1-26, 1960-10-30

In this essay I have tried to explain the of the so-called "Kierkegaard Renaissance" in the couse of modern, European history of thought as an introduction to the study of S. A. Kierkegaard. The modern European civilization was made by the Renaissance and Reformation. But the thinkers of Enlightenment did not recognize the importance of the role of the Reformation, but attributed the initiative of modernization to the Renaissance. E. Troeltsch criti cized this one-sidednessi of thought in Enlightenment. Therefore the typical modern western spirit cae be found in the German Idealism which accomplished a consequent synthesis of two opposite elements. I. Kant made this synthesis through the moralistic immanentization of God, and G.W.F. Hegel through the dialectical absolutization of Man. Both are homocentric and depend on autonomous reason. This haughtiness of human reason resulted the abstractness of thought in German Idealism. In the nineteenth century a great deep change occurred in the spiritual climate of Europe. O.Spenglar characterized it as a decline and fall of western, autonomous culture (der Untergang des Abendlandes). In this new historical situation German Idealism could no longer play a leading role as the philosophy of western Europe. Then a new leading philosophy for the present age was required. The thought of S. A. Kierkegaard had not been recognized by his contemporaries who were under the overwhelming influence of German Idealism. But in this new difficult situation after the First World War the new meaning of his thought on human existence was found, and under the influence the Thelogy of Crisis and Existentialist Philosophy was born. This is the so-called Kierkegaard Renaissance.
著者
上利 博規
出版者
静岡大学
雑誌
人文論集 (ISSN:02872013)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.53, no.2, pp.A13-A27, 2003-01-31

It is said that Hippocrates, the ancient Greek doctor, used the word Semeiotike (=the doctrine of signs) as the diagnostics. The Ancients grasped the word sign as the symptom of a disease. But we can find the new modernized usage of this word in An Essay concerning Human Understanding. John Locke said in it, "it(=semeiotike) is aptly enough termed also logike, logic". And this idea had the influence on the semiotic(s) of the Charles Sanders Peirce. But the meaning of this word in Gilles Deleuze was entirely different. He thought in the 1960's that people begin to think by sudden encounter with signs. So signs are the key of the beginning of thinking. This includes the criticism of the traditional philosophies based on logos, because they thought that people begin to think of their free will. In Difference et Repetition (Difference and Repeat, 1968) Deleuze stated eight images of thinking which obstruct the beginning of thinking by signs. One of them is to treat propositions only in the dimension of the designation and to disregard the dimension of the expression. So in Logique du sens (Logic of sense, 1969) he tried to point out the expression-dimension specifically with the non-sense of Lewis Carroll and the logic based on events of Stoicism. There aren't many adventures of Alice, but the only one adventure to come to the surface from the depth, that is the adventure to get the incorporeal splendor of language and thinking.
著者
篠原 久
出版者
関西学院大学
雑誌
經濟學論究 (ISSN:02868032)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, no.3, pp.573-593, 2004-12-31

There is a similarity in argument between Adam Smith's posthumous essay 'Of the External Senses' and Thomas Reid's Inquiry into the Human Mind. George Berkeley's New Theory of Vision was their common source of thought. The unique argument for 'instinctive perception' which Smith presents at the end of his essay, however, finds its echoes in the opening paragrath on 'Prudence' in his final edtion of The Theory of the Moral Sentiments.
著者
森永 剛
出版者
鹿児島国際大学
雑誌
鹿兒島経大論集 (ISSN:02880741)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.5, no.4, pp.三五九-三六九, 1965-02-20
著者
戸田 武雄
出版者
駒澤大学
雑誌
駒沢大学経済学論集 (ISSN:03899853)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2, no.3, pp.25-40, 1971-01
著者
佐藤 光宣
出版者
日本大学
雑誌
日本大学経済学部経済科学研究所紀要 (ISSN:03859983)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.7, pp.209-235, 1983-03-20

In this paper I have attempted in a limited way to assess the economic thought of Thorstein Veblen, the founder of the institutional school of economics. In doing this I have inquired into Veblen's criticisms of the economics of John Bates Clark who originated the theory of marginal utility economics in the United States of America. Despite the fact that the economics of both Veblen and Clark were established in the monopolistic stage of American capitalism, they are in decided conflict. This should ultimately be explained in terms of the opposed standpoints of Newtonianism and Darwinism from this viewpoint I am particularly interested in how this conflict has been carried over into economic theory. Firstly, Veblen disputed the economic assumptions held since the publication of Clark's main work, The Distribution of Wealth (1899), to the effect that patterns appeared to have been perfected. These assumptions were the hedonistic view of human nature, the free competition system as a postulate a priori, and the theory of social organism which has an essentially atomistic character. As such they are basically in common with those of the classical school, and from the standpoint of pragmatism and Darwinism, Veblen felt duty-bound to criticise them. Secondly, according to Veblen, Clark's static state had the normative character of natural law and that therefore a dynamic state founded on a static state possessed a static character. Clark claimed, moreover, that changes in the dynamic state were governed by static laws which were the real laws. In this Veblen discerned an animistic teleological preconception. Accordingly, Clark's dynamic state has no relation to Veblen's "theory of movement." The latter's theoretical theme is the process of aimless cumulative change in institutions. Furthermore, Veblen disputed Clark's theory of capital. So I studied Veblen's theory of capital as developed in The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904) and found it to be at variance with that of Clark. In Veblen's view, in a society of a pecuniary culture, that is to say in a capitalistic society, there is a pecuniary concept, and this cannot be automatically defined in material terms in the way Clark does. However, Clark essentially used the approach of the classical school and did not include intangible assets in his definition of capital. Intangible assets, or "good-will," are fundamental to the prospective earnings capacity of the enterise and are consequently concerned with capitalization. Therefore Clark could not discuss overcapitalization in detail and moreover was not capable of theoretically forecasting the Great Depression which started in 1929. On the other hand, Veblen, by applying his principle of cumulative causation, explained the phenomena of capitalization and predicted economic trends. Finally, Veblen criticized Clark's "natural" theory of distribution. This final productivity theory is based on Newtonian principles according to which the theory of distribution is characterized by a concept of capital with no scope for change, the immutability of the institution of private property and a hedonistic view of human nature. From a Darwinistic point of view, therefore, Veblen could not accept these premises and so was obliged to criticize the distribution theory itself. Furthermore, a distribution theory which had to be "natural" even permitted monopolistic behavior by enterprises. In this way Veblen investigated the residue of natural law in Clark's economics and the influence of Newtonianism and its limitations by contrasting them with his own evolutionary economics.
著者
工藤 秀明
出版者
政治経済学・経済史学会
雑誌
土地制度史学 (ISSN:04933567)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.144-153, 1999-09-30

It was around 1970 when the environmental problem became an object of public concern. Since then, many economists have tried to apply their principles to the problem and "environmental economics" has become a new field of economics. But the problem has become serious and now "the global environmental problems" are threatening the global ecology with destruction. We should ask whether economics has appropriate conceptual system to understand the relationship between nature and human beings, and to create a new economic paradigm. It seems that in Marxian Economics we need to reexamine the whole work of Karl Marx from the newer point of view, and to reorganize the system of "Critique of Political Economy" in order to be able to solve the contemporary environmental problem fundamentally.
著者
望月 和彦
出版者
桃山学院大学
雑誌
桃山学院大学経済経営論集 (ISSN:02869721)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.40, no.2, pp.41-80, 1998-12

In his famous book, "The Society of Consumption", Jean Baudrillard claimed his famous theory that consumption as such is a sign. It isn't made for the utility which it is alleged to bring, but for escalation of the social class. We can't really enjoy consumption because we are forced to pretend to enjoy it. The utitliy of it is simply an illusion. The consumption is the comsumption of signs rather than goods and services. He finds no relation between price and utility, nor exchange value and use value. According to him, all goods and services have their symbolic meaning, that is the purpose of consumption. And there are only exchange values. They make supply and demand. The exchange values are determined structually. We can't escape from the system of exchange values because they are deeply implanted in ourselves. It is a kind of ideology. So we can't feel our consumption is enforced. They shape our criterion of behavior or way to see the entire world through the aquisition of language. We can't dispute against him because we can't explain the utility definitely nor measue it. It is simply a subjective notion. So if someone claims that it comes from somewhat, not from personal satisfaction, we can't controvert against him. The only one thing which we can do is to give him no agreement. There are, however, relations which don't depend on such subjectivity. That is the technical relation. All goods and services depend each other substitutely or complementary. Such relations come from not only utility but also technical (physical) conditions. And they give rise to competition in capitalist countries that negate any illusion each other. Baudrillard puts emphasis on advertising, but it is not omnipotent. Even if producers often deceit consumers through advertising, the former can't deceive the latter eternally. Baudrillard denies people of the subjectivity, that is the ability of decision making. People always depend someone else. In the event his claim leads us to a nihilism. His theory contains a self-reference. Such theory is indisputable but indeterminant as well. And it is not a scientific hypothesis by the Popper's criterion. So it is inadequate to apply his theory to our economic life.
著者
杉浦 竜夫
出版者
北海道大学
雑誌
經濟學研究 (ISSN:04516265)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.53, no.4, pp.93-112, 2004-03-09

環境被害は自然環境の破壊にとどまらず、人間の多様な価値を剥奪している。本論の目的は、アマルティア・センの経済学的方法論を抽出し、環境問題分析へ応用可能なツールとしてこれを整理することにある。彼の方法論は環境問題分析の視点から「手段と目的との峻別」、「個人の多様性への配慮」、「帰結と過程の区別と関連の重視」、「エンタイトルメント概念」、「agency 概念」の5 点に整理することができる。この方法論は環境政策上の有用な含意を導出するものであり、水俣での事例にも適用した場合、以下が指摘できる。水俣地域住民の環境被害の回避可能性にかんするエンタイトルメント状況に留意する必要性、水俣病に特有な「機能」剥奪の増加・多様化に対応する専門医療機関の拡充や精神面でのサポートを含めた通院・在宅を通じての医療ケアの必要性、患者の自由度を支えるための公共政策として水俣地域での交通対策の推進による自由な生活の基盤確立、agency を踏まえた被害者・患者が主体的に関わることができるシステム作りを進める必要。そして、総じて述べれば水俣の真の環境再生・地域発展を視野に置く人々の価値ある生活を「目的」とした政策である。以上、センの方法論を水俣病事件に適用することで、環境被害の多面的な剥奪状況を把握する場合での有効性を確認した。
著者
古牧 徳生
出版者
神戸市看護大学短期大学部
雑誌
紀要 (ISSN:13428209)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, pp.143-160, 2005-03-01

本稿は環境倫理はいかにあるべきかについて筆者の見解を述べたものである。一章では技術者倫理と現在の環境倫理について、その輪郭を紹介する。二章からは筆者の意見である。まず現代社会の潮流としてグローバリズムをあげ、その問題点として環境破壊と社会的格差があることを指摘する。三章では「環境を守る義務」と「豊かになる権利」の兼ね合いから「公正」が問題とされること、その代表的な例としてロールズを、またその批判者としてノージックの考えをそれぞれ検討する。四章ではノージックの「自己所有権」の思想史的基礎としてロックの考え方を見る。五章では近代において産業主義の進展と共に経済学が単なる利潤と効率の追求に堕したことを批判し、「オイコス」としての地球に生きる人間にはどのような学問が必要とされるかを述べる。