著者
森岡 正芳
出版者
宗教哲学会
雑誌
宗教哲学研究 (ISSN:02897105)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.39, pp.29-42, 2022 (Released:2022-06-05)

From the standpoint of the theory of the therapy in culture, this paper describes how the COVID-19 disaster has transformed the relationship with others, and how the contact with foreign individual, who have different physical experiences and appearances that no one has ever experienced before, is affecting the world of everyday life. In doing so, I drew on the theory of the affect and the empathy from Vygotsky, Spinoza, Bin Kimura, and Edith Stein. I focused on the micro-genetic change of bodily experience and the sensual experience of otherness. It is hypothesized that such a sense of difference could also be an opportunity to open unknown parts of the self. In the process of mind-body transformation, I can read the basic bi-directional movement of the strange into the familiar and the familiar into the strange. The incorporation of this basic movement into the reconstruction of empathic relationships with others suggests a path of self-reconstitution in a world full of threats to the unknown.
著者
秋葉 剛史
出版者
科学基礎論学会
雑誌
科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.49, no.2, pp.87-109, 2022 (Released:2022-04-06)
参考文献数
51

There is a familiar tension between the two main components of non-reductive physicalism, which are physicalism, on the one hand, and the non-reducibility or autonomy of so-called special sciences (i.e., sciences other than physics), on the other. While it is often claimed that this tension can be satisfactorily resolved by adopting the subset account of realization(defended by e.g., Shoemaker (2001) and Wilson (2011)), this paper challenges that popular view, by elaborating some critical comments by Funkhouser (2014). Then, after examining Funkhouser's own position, this paper proposes a new way of resolving the aforementioned tension, which consists in refining the subset account's analysis of realization on the basis of various dependence relations between causal powers.
著者
白井 仁人
出版者
科学基礎論学会
雑誌
科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.49, no.1, pp.15-31, 2021 (Released:2021-12-14)
参考文献数
28

The ensemble interpretation (EI) of quantum mechanics has been proposed by physicists and philosophers (e.g., A. Einstein, K. R. Popper, and A. Lande). However, it is not accepted widely among modern scientists. This is because the EI is regarded as a kind of the hidden variable theories. The scientists believe that the EI is inconsistent with violation of Bell's inequalities. The present paper points out that there are various types of the EI. Several of them can be consistent with the violation. The non-local type of the EI proposed by Shirai in 1998 is also consistent. We call it “holistic ensemble interpretation (HEI).” The non-locality in the HEI includes a temporal non-locality (i.e., a future dependence), implying that the present distributions depend on the future conditions. The concept of the future dependence would be so controversial that we discuss it deeply in the latter half of the paper. Many scientists may think of it as a doubtful concept, because it disagrees with the concept of “free will.” However, there are several reasons why we should consider the future dependence.
著者
林 侑輝 坂井 貴行 山田 仁一郎
出版者
特定非営利活動法人 組織学会
雑誌
組織科学 (ISSN:02869713)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.55, no.4, pp.67-79, 2022-06-20 (Released:2022-09-17)
参考文献数
29

大学発技術の上市(製品化)を促進するプロセス要因を明らかにするために,日本の技術移転機関(TLO)における39件のプロジェクトを調査した.質的比較分析の結果によると,上市の促進のために重点化されるべき活動は特許出願前の入念なプレマーケティングと,製品開発ステージにおける境界連結活動の2点である.この発見は,科学技術の商業化に関する適合的な価値連鎖パターンが日米で異なることを示唆している.
著者
丸田 健
出版者
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.54, no.1, pp.1-1, 2021-09-30 (Released:2021-09-30)
参考文献数
33

Does (the former) “Part II” of the Philosophical Investigations represent departures for new directions toward the “philosophy of psychology”? In this article, we will go back to Wittgenstein's pre-Investigations writings and see that the examination of the concept of meaning experiences, together with the examination of other “peculiar” psychological experiences, constitutes a driving force within his later philosophy. In particular, we will note that Part II of the Brown Book deals predominantly with themes from the philosophy of psychology, and how Wittgenstein attempts therein to represent descriptions of experiences in terms of the grammar of expression, thereby shunning the Augustinian conception of description. Such interest in meaning experiences and related psychological experiences is not fully reflected in the last sections of “Part I” of the Investigations. In view of Wittgenstein's prior concern, the possibility strongly remains that the now severed “Part II” forms in some way an indispensable part of his unfinished masterpiece.
著者
野村 恭史
出版者
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.53, no.2, pp.45-63, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数
18

In the “Appendix B” to his Principles of Mathematics (1903), Bertrand Russell developed a theory of types that is different explicitly from his so-called “ramified” theory of types in Principia Mathematica (1910). It is not easy to evaluate properly this “Appendix B” theory of types, because (A) it is sometimes thought that it is only a rough sketch added hastily, and (B) it seems to play no role for Russellʼs later theoretical developments. But in this paper, I shall show that both (A) and (B) are not correct and that the “Appendix B” theory of types played an important role for his theoretical developments leading to the ramified theory of types.
著者
岡田 光弘
出版者
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.53, no.2, pp.95-114, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数
28

We discuss the equational representations of the elimination rule of inductive types, with a focus on the type “natural number”, in the context of the series of approaches to separating an equational calculus from logic. We go back to a source of the purely equational representation of the elimination rule, Wittgenstein's uniqueness rule. We analyze Wittgenstein's argument, in comparison with others', which gives supplementary remarks to Marion-Okada (2018).

2 0 0 0 OA 書評

著者
永井 均他
出版者
日本科学哲学会
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.33, no.2, pp.181-188, 2000-11-25 (Released:2009-05-29)